Hm. I have to disagree. For one thing, he is a Gawker refugee. Not really a very good fit for DS. I also don’t think it being hard to vote for Hills is a per se sign of sexism. It was hard for a lot of women, too. It was hard for me to do, but I would have pulled the lever for Liz Warren with a big ol grin on my face.

Sucking up to whom? HamNo? It is to lol—I hate at least 80% of what the guy writes. And yet, weirdly, what HamNo thinks and does is not automatically what all guys think and do.

He actually bottoms from the top, because of his social conscience.

No just another dirty trick on the part of the GOP to start campaigning against her early. When a party broadcasts their next presidential candidate as early as they did with HRC it puts them in a pretty vulnerable position.

And she was effectively cleared pretty quickly

Yeah, you don’t get the joke. He’s not just making a pun. He’s parodying self-congratulating “allies” who want to draw attention to how awesome they are for “getting it” instead of doing anything meaningful for the people they are ostensibly (and ostentatiously!) supporting. Hamno probably thought it would be a little…

Clinton’s email scandal was hanging over her head before the primaries even started. Dems nominated a candidate that was actively under federal investigation, we knew full well there was a risk of something like this happening. Unfortunately we took that risk and it didn’t work out.

I thought this was funny. But you know, I also like the critical comments b/c I think these dudes need to be kept on their toes. That was part of the point of today, right?

I don’t think it’s any good either but every time they take over jez it’s the joke they decide to use.

Yeah. It’s easier to blame people who were critical of Clinton than to accept the fact that progressives are not the ones who lost her the election (you know, with the exception of the Alex Pareenes of the world). It was some fun mix of misogyny, racism, xenophobic fear, populist fury, Trump’s cult of personality,…

hat doesn’t mean I can’t expect more of them on a women’s website on International Women’s Day of all days.

HamNo is consistently funny to me, I don’t even care.

This is becoming a weird subnarrative in the election relitigation discourse - when was the inflection point at which Democratic voters who were not excited about Hillary were obligated to mute their criticism, and now that the influence of the whole Comey incident has been at least partially unpacked, are they…

Yes, Hamilton is “all guys”. Just like you, a whiner, are “all women.”

Hey some commenters who get it!

It’s 700 words about MEN BEING SHITTY ALLIES and boasting about how allied they are only on days like today. The “Postal Carriers” are Women, and the narrator is a fake ass man talking about how much he loves womyn’s issues HOLY FUCK ARE YOU BLIND TO SYMBOLISM

Mailsplaining!

Just because someone criticizes Hillary Clinton doesn’t invalidate their “wokeness” or make them “not an ally”

Frequently I will sit at home and think about how much I appreciate mail carriers and be so impressed with myself that I just have to go on a blog for mail carriers and post about it. Frequently mail carriers themselves don’t know nearly as much about the history or importance of the mail, or the lived experience of…

“People don’t appreciate the Pony Express and the amazing work they do! I am a Pony Express ally! Pull that wretched spike out of those trestles!”