No. I’m equating hacking with hacking. Regardless of the type of game it is, it’s still hacking. The problem is the bizarre people who have come up with a euphemism for hacking saying it’s okay for those circumstances but then he in the correct side in other circumstances saying hacking is bad. It’s much easier to be…

another day, another flip flop, now hacking is bad again?  Yesterday it was an article about the “good” hacking being done to Baldur’s Gate 3, a few days before it was the “bad” hacking being done to Pokemon games.  What’s tomorrow’s “good” hacking article going to be about?

only trolls I see are the ones trying to justify hacking

hacking is hacking, needing to split it into all these different categories is quite ridiculous

seems like its a lot easier to just say hacking is bad rather than constantly trying to split hairs over “this type of hacking is bad” and “that type of hacking is okay”.  Maybe if the position was all kind of hacking is bad, then there’s no need to split hairs over different kinds of hacking.

On Monday Kotaku posts an article about how so-called “competitive” Pokemon is full of hackers. Then today there’s this article actively promoting the hacking of a game. It’s really bizarre to constantly see this constant flip flop of “bad” hacking and “good” hacking. 

Is 720p a bad thing or is the Switch being portable the greatest invention ever? Can’t have it both ways.

These headlines are always so funny “massively popular, well known YouTube/twitch/etc. celebrity accused of yadda yadda yadda” and every single time it’s some random person I’ve never heard of before but these articles always treat them as if they’re the most famous person in the world. 

Amazing and spectacular to see so many people completely misuse terms like “half a movie” just because they know a sequel is announced and coming and will go out of their way to whine and complain. 

Sounds interesting. Definitely give it a try once it gets released on an actual gaming platform. 

if a couple of random games suddenly showed up on some silly subscription service, I’m not sure how many people would bother to play it.  But if they re-released the games and sold them to people who may be interested in buying and playing them again, I know I would almost certainly buy them.  A much better approach…

a company that specializes in “ghost kitchen” restaurants that use other, established eateries—like Macaroni Grill or Brio Italian Garden—to produce branded items that are then sold via food delivery apps like Uber Eats or Door Dash

We’re talking about dedicated gaming consoles. Not general purpose personal computers and the Steam thing. 

I have to wonder if the “performance issues” in Scarlet and Violet are because people will always go out of their way to find something to complain about. 

Sure. It makes sense when you’re innovating with Game and Watch and release LCD handhelds that are light years ahead of any other LCD handheld out there. But it doesn’t make sense when they’re making games like Tears of the Kingdom that are completely unplayable in handheld mode and you’re much better off just waiting…

That is some good advice you should follow whenever you encounter someone whose preferences differ from yours. 

Kinda hard to rely on statistics like that considering they sell a model that is portable only but they don’t sell a model that isn’t portable at all. 

LCD, OLED, who cares. Hopefully they finally go back to seeking something without any useless screen because it’s going to end up plugged into a TV and using the TV screen. This focus on portable nonsense really needs to stop. 

its the same as the PS4, when you turn on a controller you are presented with the login screen for the account you want to login with.  If its the same account that’s already logged in then the current controller will power off and control switches to the new controller

Just because you or I don’t use remote play doesn’t mean there isn’t a market for it.