Picture 1, the butt is there, but it isn’t the focus, nor is it being pushed out. If anything, the butt is being flexed to show a stern posture. The lighting doesn’t highlight it and I see her back tattoo more than I see her butt. But again, it looks stoic and tough and domineering, not sexy to me. Picture 1 though…

To what? Oh, nevermind, I see it in thread now. When I first clicked in it had your comment at the top. So the answer is no, I did not get the reference. I just know that GhostBusters and Jack Thompson are involved. And I still don’t know what a SLOAR is - though Urban Dictionary says it is a sl*t and wh*re combined…

I know nothing about Tracer, but if that is her personality then she should have her backstory changed.

How is that generalized. I’m talking 100% about Tracer and how that new pose and lighting makes her look.

I fully support all 3 photos. They all are about the WOMAN and not the butt. Each of them radiate confidence and say to the viewer “this is about me - not my booty - I am MORE than just a hot body”.

There’s no troll game. Why would women want us to look at their butt if they weren’t trying to entice you to look at their butt and think of anal sex with them? Let’s face it, the entire celebrity world who does this pose is trying to get you to think of having sex with them so they can increase their popularity. I…

And in your state of mind and in your cultural environment I would be. But when you become a parent, you’ll see that I’m pretty normal. The real problem is, you don’t support helicopter parenting, and you also prefer everyone to be exposed to things to force them to “deal with it”. But what if “dealing with it” wasn’t…

The argument other people are having about this isn’t the same argument I am. Very few people support helicopter parenting despite it being psychologically studied to NOT impact children and make them not capable of functioning in the “real world”. It turns out the “real world” has nothing to do with the toxic stuff…

It’s not random. We all grew up knowing kids who had sex by 14. This is NOT normal though. It is the result of bad parenting and bad media. I’m sorry you don’t get it. It’s much easier to tease me for being a good parent than it is to just accept that I’m doing what I believe is right. Apparently you’re really cool…

Someone said that Final Fantasy is not an appropriate family game. I had to show them that Final Fantasy was T for Teen.

I am so glad other people are willing to stand up for the people who can’t for themselves. For me it’s children, only because it’s easier to guide a child than it is to fix an adult.

Okay, I get the Jack Thompson and Ghostbusters reference but what is a SLOAR? Also, what does this have to do with me? O_o

?????

Nah, maybe you’re just not getting it because you and I both see the world differently. Why not try asking me questions. I’ll take the time to explain one more time. It’s just that, you might not understand since you’re not a father so it’s just not territory you’re meant to understand yet (unless you grew up with…

Well wait a minute. Why did you correct me and then dismiss me. Oh nevermind. I’ll do me. You do you. Potato, Potahto.

LOL! I’m just looking at it from a licensing perspective. Technically you’re not supposed to install the game on more than one computer either. The only exception to the rule are games that have a server side login rather than local login; but that’s only because the server handles how many people can be logged in…

I completely agree.

The retail fee counts as a lifetime subscription. You technically aren’t buying the software, you’re buying the end user license agreement to play during the term allowed (infinite).

I’ve spent the entire day explaining it. Try looking in the several threads if you’re really interested.

People still whining in an article from this morning. So not entirely over.