you are a moron
you are a moron
moving the goalposts toots
those cong women were impressive, dance across a minefield like a prima ballerina dodging sniper fire, then disappear down a tunnel like a goddamn prairie dog. if i’da caught one i might still be over there...
well maybe if theyd had picked up an m16 instead of playing mommy with some bandaids things would have gone down differently in the mekong delta...
oh you meenz the wimminz n’ nurzez and oxzilary groopz and im dizmizzing it zzzzzzzzzzz
how could they not? but you asked me to name a feminist who didnt, which is by definition, impossible and represents the aforemnetioned circularity of reason. do you follow? because it absolutely makes sense.
it’s funny when you add the “z” to guns and bombs. those were the things that killed 55,000 servicemen, not some candy or kids toy or something. they are serious, scary things. show some respect.
is it possible that a feminist could advocate for a male-only draft and still be a feminist i.e. someone who believes in equality amongst the sexes? it seems impossible. so obviously I couldn’t name one. it’s a like a witches spell.
spoken like someone who wouldn’t last 5 secs in the bug infested jungles 50 clicks outside of hanoi. couldn’t tell the mosquitos from the bullets buzzing by my ears. I had a necklace of ears that I traded for some bug spray in ‘68. turned out it was mace - and that is one of the funny stories. can’t confuse the cong…
so there is nobility in allowing the holocaust to go on unfettered, if we all so choose?
and respond to the circularity of your argument
so they couldnt even conceive of it because of the patriarchy, right? thats obviously the next step right?
and the us may have lost, but they did like 20x more asskicking. that is true and you know it
or lucretia mott, or eleanor roosevelt
that is a circular argument. a feminist wouldn’t say male-only draft, therefore a person who says male only draft is not a feminist. susan b anthony did not advocate for females in the service
“probably a lot more complicated” let’s leave your assumptions out of this. and not everyone was a hippy dippy dodger trying to end the draft, some people believed in their country back then, even if misguided.
you do seem pleased at the idea of my father’s friends dying over there though, so you have that going for you.
oh ok, so it is that one. in nam us suffered 55000 casualities the cong like 1.3 million, so the US did the ass kicking. and now only advocated for equality in the services post nam draft.
that’s the group that continues to refer to the UVA fabulist as a “survivor” despite the debunking?
hahaha, the jury is out on that one