holdingthedoor
HoldingTheDoor
holdingthedoor

Too funny. The picture you chose was a ... drum roll please .... single lane. Thanks for making my point for me.

This whole other side of the road argument? 100% strawman. It has absolutley nothing to do with what side of the road they drive on because it can be clearly seen that the motorcycle crowded into the cars’ lane - Two vehicles, one lane, asshole motorcyclist hits bollard, and another myiopic post by cream wobbly.

You can see in the video the car is next to the raised sections in the roadway. The bike is squeezing between the car and the raised median. Thats why he hit the bollard. Watch the video.

the bike was on the right side of the car. the car was in the right lane. there was not enough room for him. The motorcyclist was clearly not in his own lane causing him to hit the bollard because there was NOT ENOUGH ROOM. Instead of insulting me watch the damn video again. That way you might know wtf you are talking

You know what, fuck Peter King. King is a shit bucket who just happened to make name for himself in an era of crappy sports reporters because he caught the coat tails of an ascending NFL. Used to read his column every monday and tuesday. Somewhere he lost the nerve to call bullshit bullshit and proceeded to like the

and what side of the car was the bike on? the right. In the same freakin lane as the car was in. Care to continue supporting your obviously incorrect assertions?

So you are arguing that a motorcyclist can overtake on the right, when the motor vehicle is in the right lane? I don’t think so...the first criteria regarding overtaking in the highway code is “ the road is sufficiently clear ahead”

That was a legal overtaking? No way no how -

hahahahaha..... way to go Cheddar Bob