That is 100% the QB’s fault.

The entire Democratic Party machine is dominated by 80's era Republicans in Democrat clothing. Clinton (both) were blatantly Reaganites without specifically stating so, as are all of the major party elites.

“Creating Jobs and growing our country’s economy”.

Not if we can defeat the media driven centrists who are constantly worried about pissing of billionaires, and then defeat the white nationalist party. 

He has always been republican-lite. That’s why Obama picked him, to appeal to centrists and left leaning conservatives... and it worked brilliantly.

I can’t bash on the US, we had the exact same thing in France (Macron as a safe choice against the horrors of a Le Pen presidency), but damn if choices based on electability don’t make my blood boil everytime... Elections are such a flimsy and unpredictable thing, it’s maddening that the only thing that seems to have…

If the Dems put this dude up they’re gonna lose, hard, and god damn will they deserve it. Of course, they’re not the ones who’ll have to deal with the consequences — we are.

He has every one of Hillary Clinton’s negative attributes with none of the positive ones and none of this will matter because for every person on the center/left spectrum radicalized by Trump, there are two or three people who just want to vote for whoever can promise them they won’t have to care about politics again…

Yeah, with how dangerous cars can be, you’d think we’d make people register them, and get licenses to operate them, and prove they are competent to operate them, and even in a lot of states require inspections to ensure the cars are safe to be on the road.

But part of the issue is that we take steps to prevent those other kind of deaths. Meanwhile, we do fuck all about guns.

So I guess now we’re just going to pretend the assault rifle ban from ‘92 to ‘04 didn’t exist.

Sure, he’s an “Old White Man.” He’s also a guy who can run high IQ circles around 45; experience-in-politics circles around your-flavor-of-the-day- younger Dem; and a freakin’ circle of compassionate fire around all of the other contenders.

Yes, that’s it, ramp up that sanctimony, surely being a presumptuous asshole will sway people to your cause. I just know it.  

Oh, you know, decades of concession (oh, I’m sorry, “compromise”, as long as that compromise means always bending in the direction of Republicans’ will) that has directly contributed to mass incarceration, the erosion of abortion rights that are now on death’s door, and the acceleration of climate change that has,…

So, I don’t really follow these things closely, but what sort of policy positions do you guys in the sanctimonious bottom-shelf concern-trolling crowd tend to prefer?

A whiny shitlib?

An angry boomer comment?

Seriously. I’m usually pretty open-minded to criticisms based on representation, but the criticism of Tarantino has a different feel to it. It seems like a bunch of people just really dislike his movies and his personality and use mostly pretty weak social justice concerns to pile on and call him shitty.

Lol if you believe Harris’ “progressive” turn would last fifteen seconds into her administration I gotta say: I don’t know you, but I’m genuinely concerned for you.

Scratch a neoliberal get a republican. Couldn’t be happening to a better selection of incompetent people.