I must disagree MoonTopples—at least for me. For me, a story is about its progress, where it begins and where it ends. When it's done, I look back on the whole of the story and come to some sort of conclusion as to whether it was a good story or not. If I feel that the ending is false or inadequate in some other…

If I find a Zippo with Tsunami engraved on it, I'll try to get it back to you.

1) The article writer doesn't come up with the headline; that's the editor's job.

Admittedly, I don't watch a lot of network TV, but I was STUNNED by the embedded Ford Fusion commercial. At first, I actually thought they were making some kind of plot point when Wells starts the car with her phone and checks how much gas is left in the tank, etc. I thought, "Oh, they're going to run out of gas and…

Good points.

Yes, the fingerprint moment reached a new level of incredibility—even for this show. I think I've watched my last episode.

Agreed. Why do the graphics in even the most commonplace computer programs on TV shows and in movies always look so much slicker and have much more elaborate graphics than would ever be practical?

Okay, that's the wittiest comment by far in this thread.

Definitely. I thought the trailer was quite funny in places. But even if I thought there was zero chance that it's any good, I'd still be very curious to see *how* it failed. The film being a comedy, nothing else really matters except this: Is it funny? Does it make me laugh?

Maybe I don't understand film budgeting—actually, there's no maybe about it. I don't know anything about film budgeting. But wouldn't the affordability of a car accident (as described in the script) be something that was determined long before cameras started rolling? From what Effie Brown said, they seem to be on…

LOL. Finally, someone commenting here with a sense of humor.

I don't object to what Effie Brown is doing (for the most part). She's right. It's often her job to say no, to be the spoilsport, and to keep the production on track.