What’s unbelievable is your ignorance. It’s like you haven’t listened to a word she’s said.

Or, maybe your mind is so clouded you can no longer see the big picture. This is one of the most disingenuous, disappointing comments sections I’ve seen on this site.

I swear sometimes we are our own worst enemy

Yes she could.

You’re not going to explain becauseyou can’t, because it wasn’t wrong, because it’s essentially the same thing that most black parents in America tell their kids, who they would prefer to not end up dead at the hands of some racist cop—essentially the same thing my father told me.

Neither does being black...

Except Bernie gave the same answer that any of those people would give—the time and place to fight police misconduct is not when you’re on the street with a cop stopping you, because the result is you’ll likely end up dead. If walking away from that interaction alive is your primary goal, then you respond to officers…

Ok, whatever 🙄

Bernie’s answer is essentially the same thing that every black parent in America who doesn’t want their kid to end up dead as the result.of some bullshit pretextual stop actually tells their kid: if the police stop you, act respectfully, speak clearly and calmly, don’t make any fast or sudden movements, comply.

Not to defend this dude, but “arbitrary and capricious” is the standard in an Article 78 proceeding to overrule a government determination, so he’s just applying the appropriate language here.

Yes, if only Bernie could only attract the youth vote, then he’d have a fighting chance 🙄

HRC garnered more votes in 2016 than any candidate in history

Yeah, rest up n the laurels of past victories all the way to the grave. It’s time to move forward. That is the point. It’s well past time.

It Almost seems like liberals, especially white liberals, make it a point of, well, missing the point.

Liberals have gone fucking insane.

“Support for the LGBTQ+ community isn’t political in itself.”

Why not just vote for whomever you want abd let others do the same. Hate to break it to you, but the damage is already done with Trump. 

Then you’re kidding yourself. The Court is and always has been political, ever since Marbury v. Madison...

Dunno, I don’t pay that much attention to this stuff. But the rule at play here, by its own terms, is totally discretionary. The rule says they don’t have to do anything, but reserve the right to as they see fit.

What the fuck are you talking about?