Who knows? My guess is Australian law would apply.
hntergren
hntergren
Except the popular vote isn’t the metric by which we elect our president, so who fucking cares?
As much as I hate to see it, you’ve been right all over this thread—I don’t know where the author is getting the perspective they’re setting forth in this article, but it certainly shouldn’t come form this exchange.
Naahhh
Yeah, and my point is removing him from office in that manner is a bad idea.
Even if they are successful, nothing will inflame his base more than impeachment. It’s a lose-lose proposition. The only way to come out in top is to beat him clean in 2020.
This.
This.
What? That’s kind of ridiculous. You may not like the character, but her arc is one of the most fleshed out and consequential of all. She was a “rightful heir to the throne” in hiding and exile with no followers, no people, no money, and no army, and no real motivation other than birthright. Her arc is about her…
This is how I see things playing out too.
Maybe because it was necessary to address the problems in her jurisdiction. Everybody has an opinion, nobody has the fucking facts though. People hear jailing parents for truancy, which is obviously the most limitrd framing of the issues and blow a gasket. I’m not even really a Kamala fan, but the American electorate…
A whole six people agree with your tired take
He’s likely not
Fuck off... Don’t touch my suit and tie
But we're free. FREEEEEEEE.
Almoat nobody is in favor of open borders
I mostly agree, I think they should be allowed to compete according to gender identity for exactly those reasons. It’s not really that widespread of an issue, the science seems at worst unclear and at best showing there’s no real issue after hormone therapy, and the reality of life is that different people are going…
That doesn’t make her transphobic
I don’t know where I fall practically in the argument, though I do know where I stand ethically. But I think it’s clearly a matter of what’s naturally occurring vs. what is medically induced.