I put a lot of effort into that.

We hate the new trailer for Jessica Jones, and here’s why you should too.

Under Indictment

While AVClub articles don’t often involve deep research, they don’t have proofreaders.

I’ll give Johnny a pass on the sexist and racist stuff, as far as it was really common then(making fun of how Chinese people speak, etc.). His real talent was making the show seem like you were hanging out with the coolest people in Hollywood. Fallon mostly annoys me for making it seem like you are watching an idiot…

They show old Tonight Shows on Antenna TV. I am old enough to have seen them back when they ran (the 80s ones). They aren’t funny at all. I don’t like Fallon’s version much, but Johnny’s joke are predictable, and often offensive (although so were most of the comedians at the time). There was a reason that Lettterman…

If you mean The Seven Lady Godivas, it’s pretty tame.

Finally, someone has the guts to stand up for Kim Kardashian and the negative attention she gets, without doing anything to attract it. She clearly just wants her privacy.

I’ll never understand this desire to make biographies of people because they created something fantastic. Peter Pan is a classic book that has inspired many people. That doesn’t mean the guy who wrote it was remotely interesting. I love Dr. Seuss’ work, but I’m bored just thinking about a movie of his life.

Are you thinking of Shel Silverstein? I don’t think Dr. Seuss drew or wrote for Playboy, not that it would bother me if he had.

I still love Obama and think it looks like a sperm.

Yours must be sad and angry life.

Judges gonna judge!

Pot. Kettle. Black

A Swamp Thing movie could be amazing. They should just hire Alan Moore to write it. He’s easy to work with and loves doing Hollywood stuff.

You nailed it. I never finished grade school. I don’t work. I’m dumb. I also have a disturbing habit of “crazy connection in anything.” Now, I’m depressed.

Look at the post right below this one (assuming yours are organized the same way). West Coast Shady outlines it in the picture (although he doesn’t entirely outline the more bulbous part). Not sure why you want to attack me personally for this. Who gives a shit either way? Frankly, it comes off as prudish to tell…

Anyway, it may say something about me that I think the vein looks spermy, but it doesn’t mean it’s not what the artist intended. I looked at some of his other paintings, and he has drawn sperm in the backgrounds, not like it is claimed to be in the presidential portrait, but it is a motif. Either way, I don’t care and…

This tower?

He does. It’s just a little less spermy.