What the actual hell is the tone of this article???
What the actual hell is the tone of this article???
The obvious desire to insinuate that Alec Baldwin is criminally responsible for purposefully shooting someone is gross.
That doesn’t even make sense. It’s not like there are some situations where a film would need to use live rounds. So why would this even be a possibility? One thing we know: it was almost certainly all caught on camera.
Why call out that there was no definitive proof the gun was not a prop gun, but not any of the other facts of the story that came from the same or similar sources (i.e. the investigators)? Seems like you’re trying to imply something.
Shannon doesn’t have a conscience or any journalistic integrity. The entirety of her portfolio is just an ongoing effort to find new ways to drag Jezebel further into the sleazy underbelly of tabloid gossip and celebrity harassment.
What a cunt move, Shannon. “Alec Baldwin discharged a firearm on the set of his latest film” is followed soon thereafter with, “The firearm, which is being referred to as a “prop gun” in the media without any definitive proof that it was not a real firearm...”
The way this has been reported is so bizarre to me. Some headlines refer to Hutchins as “crewmember”, others as simply “woman”. I get that news outlets want clicks and go with focusing on Baldwin, but surely her name or title are to also be respected (I can see not using her name to give her family privacy in dealing…
$3.33 per game (before tax) with all the DLC included is a pretty solid deal. I’ve already played through all of them though so not for me!
$3.33 per game (before tax) with all the DLC included is a pretty solid deal. I’ve already played through all of…
As a deep-dyed eggplant lover, I find this fascinating and I applaud your efforts. Out of curiosity, what exactly about it do you find off-putting?
I haven’t played Back 4 Blood yet (planning to give it a shot tonight) but my concern about the new systems isn’t that they’ve added a progression system but more about how they’ve gone about doing it. I think having the ability swap out parts for your weapons is interesting but having to stop and think about which…
My driving test involved turning right out of the DMV lot, turning right five more times (I literally drove around the DMV, then back into the lot), then parallel parking in a space big enough for a battleship. That was it. I didn’t even have to show I knew how to turn left.
Lol.
It’s the wording of it that bothers me. Letting another person drive your vehicle isn’t inherently reckless, what they do behind the wheel determines that.
A 200hp car can do 116 as well. This isn’t about the horsepower, but more about the idiot doing 116 in a 30. More bureaucratic red tape because somebody didn’t follow the current laws isn’t going to change with new laws.
The daughter of the woman that died says that Meisman allowing Mongan drive the car was reckless and now her mother is gone because of it.
Is it bad that I was concerned about the dog too ?
They killed a dog. Kill the driver
I say this as someone who likes driving fast, who owns fast cars, and who is generally skeptical of adding more bureaucracy to our lives:
The gay bar in my hometown was across the street from the art school several of my girlfriends attended (23yo me had a type..), and they had a super-solid $4.99 burger-and-fries lunch special. Probably 3/4 of the time I spent there was eating those.
This happens to my brothers as well. They’re tall and athletic looking and the number of times other men have tried to start fights with them for ... existing while tall?? is astounding.