You copywriting too now? Also you missed a golden opportunity by not putting Fred Sanford on the cover of your book.
You copywriting too now? Also you missed a golden opportunity by not putting Fred Sanford on the cover of your book.
you and your friend Quadpole keep putting words in my mouth...I never said directly...its still is a boon to goldman whether it benefits them directly or indirectly
financial support isn’t the same as giving additional money (its helping them in a way that benefits them financially) so we can throw that point out right away...and lol its not equivalent to trading preowned goods (similar sure but equivalent no) and even if it is the point is irrelevant as I mentioned before...but…
you know that’s how protests work right...which part are you offended by their practicing their right to free speech or the fact that they are protesting on public land...if you don’t value free speech that’s fine but i don’t know what to tell you bud....even “legitimate” protests that require permits and police…
lol really bruh?....you don’t realize how ridiculous that is...you think the solution is either to give financial support to the company they are protesting against in hopes of talking it out (as if they can’t throw out a “disruptive” shareholder) or buy enough shares of Goldman to organize a pro-protester voting bloc…
fair enough....i guess our disagreement stems from our differing views on achievement....i view achievement from a collective standpoint not saying i devalue or reject individualism...i just don’t think you can divorce personal accomplishments from the effects they have on broader society...although i will admit in…
His less than proactive attitude towards Civil Rights made him a palatable Black republican choice for the nomination while his blackness in combination with Thurgood Marshall’s retirement and America’s woefully inadequate knowledge of racial dynamics made him politically untouchable.
Not disingenuous at all really. Doing nothing is literally the reason why he is a Supreme Court justice and accurately describes his attitude toward oral arguments
What has the man done? Excuse me? Are you forgetting the time he sexually harassed a subordinate for a period of years only to escape the allegations using the same “race-baiting” techniques he spent the majority of his career speaking out against... Ooo wait I think I see your point.
No, an orange skinned monster is what makes America great. Also your whole statement is nonsense. Asian men aren’t at the bottom of the racial, gender or class hierarchy. Attractiveness is based on a lot more than stereotypical physical types and beauty standards. Access to capital and privilege can also help attract…
truth...i’ve heard [blank negative behavior or characteristics] is a female trait more than i’d care to recall...but some menfolk especially menfolk of color (while acknowledging the feminist movement’s improvement with respect to intersectionality) disagree with how the feminist movement privileges heterosexist…