Nah dude, she said that. Read her article on the Seahawks.

Fair enough, just your original response required layers of inference to get to this point.

I don’t know, once you get around the blustering, clumsy delivery Dilf has a point. Kaep has a million ways to get his message out and $19 million to support his cause, so it isn’t unreasonable to question whether his choices are hurting the team (which if they are and he doesn’t care, makes him a great protestor but…

That’s good and a fine point, but your initial response to me still doesn’t make any sense.

What the fuck does that even mean? You sound like Charlie Kelly, Attorney at Law, just saying words you've heard other, smarter people say.

This is a good point. Obviously Dilfer has seen the success guys like Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless have had being shameless shit stirrers.

Honest question: when encountering an opinion that is inconsistent with yours, how often do you dismiss it as ignorance and how often to you accept that not everyone has the same worldview?

No, according to Kara Brown at Jez, if you don’t kneel during the anthem you are supporting the “oppressor.”

Hmm, looks like both have had several investigations and as of yet nothing has stuck. But you did a nice job bolding some words.

You have a lot of extremely reductive opinions, almost as if your life experience is Twitter and a self-selected echo chamber.

Would you rather pay $60k for them to be coddled and see only sanitized veiws of the world?

Thanks for the added context. Your school treats its students like 5 year-old children in equal need of coddling and spankings.

That is true, that Republicans, like Democrats, are not always principled. However, complaints about the overreach (which is related to size) of the federal government are based on the overreach being contrary to the enumerated powers granted to Congess in the Constitution. I realize this can sometimes be bastardized…

No, leaving aside that a ticket isn’t a contract, I’m pretty sure that you can rarely if ever sign away your rights to sue for an intentional tort (e.g. assault and battery).

Nothing in the federal system set forth in the US Constitution suggests that municipal governments have powers state governments do not, that is not the case with respect to US vs. state governments. So this comment is sort of dim.

I don't have all the answers.

He is saying that while also trying to not upset other customers in the process.

Can’t blame them one bit. It would be a violation of the fiduciary duty to the members/stockholders to continue a marketing relationship that is no longer beneficial.

So she is basically Cliven Bundy, but since she’s a “hippie” then she is sympathetic.

15 year olds are impressionable dumbfucks. Even the smart ones.