However, he’s spent a disproportionate amount of airtime over the years demanding un-earned super fights against benched big leaguers like George St-Pierre and Nick Diaz.

We need to pull this band-aid off and let Trump be Trump for a bit and show everyone what an absolute horror of a president and human being he is and get that impeachment/25th amendment solution rolling instead of propping him up to “barely even tolerable to his own people.”

Letting “Trump be Trump” could mean nuclear war.  Thanks, but no thanks.

It’s powerful and some might say “broken” in PvE. I don’t see it that way. PvE should be power-fantasy fun and it’s really only good for clearing trash mobs, which, who cares? That’s an easy situation to handle already.

Fair point, and this was how things were in D1 for the most part.

Thank you for proving every stereotype to be true, you joyless piece of trash.

Mmm. That’s good kinja.

This is this dude’s first-ever post lol

Infusion costs seem crazy at first until you notice two things:

This is good to know, I have the first 2 expansions so I still have plenty of content to go through (because I dont plan on buying Forsaken just yet), so I appreciate a clear answer.

This is categorically false. Players can participate in everything they could before except when the Nightfall strike is one that was introduced with Forsaken.

There is. They’re still going to be releasing some new content for players who haven’t bought the expansions.

To Musberger’s credit, this is the first time I’ve seen scare quotes be scary.

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that ol’ Mussy missed the point of the outcry he caused when he verbally mussed his point nearly six years ago.

Lol you said"cowboys"

Even with Mack...I still have eagles cowboys falcons saints vikes packers rams easily ahead of bears....and I can probably be convinced that panthers lions and niners are better

IT’S HAPPENING

Two thoughts:

I feel… fine with this? The fact that there is a rule on the books about a player needing to give their “best efforts”, which is an intrinsically subjective thing, puts this into the umpire’s arena of responsibilities. Being subjective, however, I think its up to the chair umpire’s judgment into how to enforce it, but…

Provided the umpire didn’t make any questionable calls, is this really a big deal? Why are we complaining that the umpire wanted players to play good tennis instead of bad tennis?