herpderpderp
herpderp64
herpderpderp

I think i hear a PA announcement...

"Can Volvo please remove their red sedan off the Subaru podium? Thank you."

I don't think it is that figure, I think Jason faffed up the numbers.

Ok, I'll give you the centre stack and instrument binnacle, but the rest of the interior looks gaudy, especially the wheel! Ew.

It's nice, but the booty looks better on the 'vert.

No.

No.

Yeah... but no.

Woo! 'Straya!!!

1 - These electric guys do not activate above a certain speed (my Audi is 10km/h - quite a violent stop).

It's not an Emergency brake. It is a Park brake.

What's the point of cool shit if you can't enjoy it?

God bless you, sir.

My mate owned this car. It was a bit small, definitely gutless. Reasonable economy. Manual with low range was a nice touch. I find this review hilarious!!

1 - Wider power band
2 - Lighter weight

I'm 6'3" and I have no trouble sitting in the back of a Q5, headroom and legroom included. It is suspiciously cavernous inside...

Seems like lots of diatribe headed towards this car for unknown reasons - this vehicle is the size the Cayenne should have been from the beginning, has the potential to tip the scales half a tonne lighter than the behemoth sitting above it. It's almost guaranteed to look better than the Panamera which is the other

^This.

C63 kills this in every way son.

I rented a V6 Mustang convertible. My god, I've never driven such a shit car. It makes a Camry seem interesting.

Us Australians designed that face for you yanks. The blame lays squarely on U S and A.