Fahey’s response is perfect, and yeah, there isn’t much to say about a comic that totally misrepresents what actually happened here. At no point did we claim to “see lots of problems” with unannounced/unfinished games, and at no point did the developers tell us things that they wanted to keep secret; all of the…
Hepcatty
hepcatty
Sunday Comics is supposed to be a happy place, both for the readers and for me. I look forward to compiling this post every weekend, catching up on all of my favorite webcomics in the process.
The bible is only the uncontested Word of God when it supports my exact opinion, though.
As is, people can “parody” whatever they want. Often in quite vulgar ways. Copyright does not protect you from that, it’s considered fair use.
If the book entered the public domain, and some scandalous group decided to publish their own version, to line their own pockets, could they?
Betting they were thinking of that Denzel Washington movie.
He needs to drop that frothy rhetoric.
Honestly, I kind of think it’s meant to be a satire of the ongoing pissing contest between Marvel and Fox. Squirrel Girl is a very meta character, after all; it’d make all kinds of sense.
The fighting experts will be here very soon to inform us all who would win in a real fight, and how little we know about fighting.
Well if all were right in the world IT WOULD BE
Who Why is JODY HiGHROLLER?
That was my first thought upon reading the article. I hope there’s a sound basis to sue the Texas government or law enforcement.
I’m always cautious about Roe v. Wade, because remember that right after the court established a right to privacy, they also said, “We repeat, however, that the State does have an important and legitimate interest in preserving and protecting the health of the pregnant woman, whether she be a resident of the State or…
You are incorrect.
roe v wade determined that there was an inherent constitutional right to privacy under the 14th amendment
Question: if this leak actually happened, could patients sue the state of Texas for breach of privacy?
Once again: http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org
If only there were some kind of precedent clarifying that women seeking abortions do, in fact, have a constitutional right to privacy.