I guess since so many MRAs are into evopsych, they think that they should be killing the cubs of other males so their own sperm survive or something.

This is what happens when you look at animals and say, "It looks like the female chooses which males to mate with. I guess that should be good enough to base all human interactions upon."

The whole "buyers remorse" debacle could be avoided with just a couple of progressive (as opposed to regressive) solutions. One, give women reproductive freedom and remove the stigma surrounding sex. This way women will be able to choose freely who they want to have sex with, and they won't face any repercussions for…

It depends on what you would consider to be MRAs. Some 'MRAs' like myself are concerned with men's social issues and want to generate conversation in order to solve them. And then there are just hateful little men who want to be able to sexually assault their daughters and not have any questions raised. (Extreme case…

Not especially. From what I've seen of the movement, only very few are racially motivated. However, this is without a doubt a straight man's movement. If I were to center a conference on the social issues of men in the Western world, one of the top things on the list is the social stigma that gay men face, but I…

For the first instance, while suicide and depression are both problems that run rampant with no regard to sex boundaries, it is a disease that is significantly more fatal to men. How lambasting female rape victims solves that problem, I have no fucking clue.

While technically true, feminism has its hands full pretty much focusing on women's issues, and since admittedly most feminists are women, they experience more of the negatives that affect women more than negatives that affect men. That's why I do believe that a movement centered on men would be more effective at…

In regards to the warning Elam gives beforehand at the event, in my experience with the furry fandom, there is a similar thing that happens. Because of the way the fandom has been treated by the media in the past, other media outlets always set out to 'expose' the fandom, which is basically a bunch of people who like…

I'm not infantilizing anybody. I just believe that people's thoughts and beliefs don't formulate in a vacuum, and that there is a slight possibility that what people view in porn might influence what they are attracted to in real life.

But she consented to have her ideological beliefs denigrated...

There's a good deal of experience out there that says that isn't the case when talking about online pornography. Many users, typically young men, get bored of certain types of 'vanilla' material and when they stumble upon new, more fetish-based material, they often acclimate to that.

I'd be lying if the porn that I viewed at 12 or so didn't shape my views of sexuality at all.

Poor analogy. A better one would be you can enjoy watching the Godfather but think that Al Pacino is a piece of shit for starring in it.

At the same time, I don't see how we can change the way we view and treat women for the better while simultaneously treating porn like it's perfectly a-ok.

My issue was more with the argument itself rather than the actual topic because that argument only serves to negate discussion rather than provide an actual point of view. These sexual obligations don't happen in a vacuum; they are a part of a larger social progression towards more obscure and violating sexual acts.

Well of course everything is relative. Hell, some people might be perfectly fine with dressing up like an animal and acting like a pet dog with their partner and being forced to shit on the floor or drink out of the toilet. But when the current sexual fashion implores that all women engage in this behavior in order to…

I fucking hate all this: if you don't want xx thing to happen, don't do it. If you don't want to get pregnant, don't have sex. If you don't want to get raped, don't go out drinking. If you don't like kiddy porn, don't watch it. If you don't like an employer's insurance policy, don't work for them. If you get harassed…

People are supposed to teach their kids a lot of things, but seeing as we have cadres of anti-vaccers and religilous morons running around, we can't rely on that entirely to solve the problem, especially when children are able to absorb negative messages earlier than most parents would even consider discussing sexual…

I don't understand why so many people believe that an 'exciting' sex life requires that one or more parties have to subjugate themselves in degrading acts or have pain or humiliation or injury inflicted upon them in order to satisfy some sort of greater obligation to the current sexual fashion lest they be ridiculed…

So in my current drugged stupor, here's what I'm getting here. The article itself is a new perspective that I wasn't previously privy to, but that still belies the 'real' issue that many people have regarding the events and ideologies surrounding Knox.