In memory of Paul Walker.

So the argument goes, be offensive otherwise there is no freedom of speech? If there was a danger of freedom of speech actually being taken away, I might agree with you, but there isn't.

I still don't see it. Just a slight skin discoloration which is very normal.

lol.

Be prepared for everyone to ask you to reach for something on a high shelf.

What's the point of offending anyone?

His ability to sell written works posthumously?

Avoids Kardashians.

Starting at 2:06. But I don't buy it.

Never accept the pickle juice.

He's like a french bulldog puppy being told not to hump a leg ... it might stop him for a little bit, but before the end of the conversation ... Charles is going to be humping someone's leg.

And the say Deadspin isn't real journalism. This is some Pulitzer investigative journalism shit right there Tom! Good on ya!

you don't know what the word sociopathic means.

No. Seriously Kevin. This is revenge porn and illegal in some states. Why are you guys still showing it?

It's ... it's getting better. I tend to believe in an innate morality. A core that can and does exist even in the absence of taboos, shame, societal pressure, and being raised. I think not committing bestial acts falls within that core for almost all people.

this is getting weird. now you suggesting that bestiality feels good and that societal pressure and religion are at least partly the reason not to engage in it. this inversely does imply that the reason to not engage in bestiality would be weakened if not for societal pressure and religion.

Dolphins are wild animals and this can certainly happen, just let go of the fin like Young. I doubt this is some Brian Williams shit.

you ... realize you just suggested that bestiality was only bad because of religious and societal shame, right?

Isn't he also reducing himself to the same level as animals? Why would only one be implied?

The biggest issue I have with this is that Charles thinks Daryl's comments were ONLY about analytics.