@Azures: Why bother going through the trouble of data redundancy when it's easier just to have a printed manual?

@twinturbo2: Arcade driving game....meh. Sessions are too short, and I've played it before. Quake...yet another first person shooter game. Yawn.

@arionfrost: Ha! Good one :)

@Bichatse: Are you still going on about this? Old news. Move on with your life.

@twinturbo2: Read it again.

@Cojo21: They've got one song that is good. The rest are not.

@fuchikoma: It's not that I care. It's that I am curious as to why people waste their time on such a stupid and frivolous topic.

@fuchikoma: I grew up playing the Master System/SNES/Genesis. I never liked Star Fox. It was a neat gimmick at the time with the Super FX chip, but otherwise it wasn't much fun.

@Caelestis: At least they will never run out. The whole CO2 argument is a load of bull anyways.

@Andrew Vance: That's what I said. Maybe you are one as well if that wasn't clear to you.

@nicvia: I'd rather not have the Wii tarnished by having that turd game on it.

@ClaudioIphigenia: Yes, that is how it works. They are the current generation of consoles, since they succeeded the previous consoles. It doesn't really have anything to do with horsepower. It's chronological.

Shouls have paid attention to spell check, too.

@ColdDog: It won't help. Trees are renewable.

@Azures: Digital is unreliable; it's too easy for something to get erased. Never will I put all my reliance into digital. Only an idiot would do that.

@theBMB: Ubisoft won't be providing manuals for retail games. It's different than a game you download, where they have to put the instructions somewhere within the download.

@Spycrab!: Bingo.

@Arenegeth: Nope. The day games go digital only, is the day I turn my back on gaming. I refuse to pay lots of money for something that isn't tangible. I will not pay $60 for what amounts to nothing but 1's and 0's that has no physical form.