gthing
gthing
gthing

I nominate Mr. Multiverse!!!1!

ctrl+f, "gthing" ...

If Apple releases the iPad 3 with a 2048x1536 screen, I'll eat my hat.

It's legal to fire weapons in lots of rural areas. Looks pretty rural to me.

Gee I wonder if they're sponsored by Chevy. They could have done without the obvious advertising and people would have figured it out on their own.

The internet is dangerous. If people don't need a lot of money to get the word out about what's going on with the country, then money can no longer control the way things go in a democracy.

While your full disclosure and list of qualifications are impressive, unless you did some CSI investigation and found out where this guy lives, you're talking out of your ass.

@SeniahD said s/he didn't understand how it was a horrible proposition. I wasn't arguing for or against it being a privacy concern, I was answering their question. It's a horrible proposition to some because they put more importance on their privacy than $5.

Same here.

To some people privacy is important.

First - that app is not the most serious Android Siri competitor. Second - it is powered by users' answers. A detail that pretty much makes this entire article meaningless.

Yea mobile Safari is awesome. I love it when my pages reload every time I switch tabs and I lose whatever I was doing.

I haven't tried since 10.5 or so, but you used to be able to enable resolution independence and you could resize apps make them tiny. It was pretty awesome but also broke a lot of stuff. I'm excited to see the feature rounded out and functional!

Yes. I've been there. iPads are advertised in every square inch of available space.

I don't believe there's a single person in China who hasn't seen an iPad. They are EVERYWHERE.

So they make one guy drink blue dye, then they show how disgusting it is that everything looks blue? I remain unconvinced.

No. Where I live my choices are Comcast or Qwest DSL. We actually have a state-wide fiber optic network that is awesome, but Comcast has been successful in convincing many of the cities that allowing the network would present unfair competition to their monopoly. As a result, only a handful of cities actually offer

Thanks, that's interesting. I of course use 8:1 as a rough ratio and realize there are other factors involved. Still I'm trying to make a simple point (which remains), not write a scientific paper. If I ballpark it either way I'm sure I'll get someone correcting me.