grumpygirl-old
grumpygirl
grumpygirl-old

i think that this thought, which i also touched upon, is where the real fighting can begin.

"work at will" doesn't allow your employer to sexually harass you, or any other illegal things an employer can make you do. you have some legal protection in states where work is at will

correct, its against FB TOS to give anyone else your password. though i'm sure they can *make* you log in so they can see. but poking around your friend's pages, when they are not supposed to see anyone but friends? *that* might actually legally be a violation of the friend's privacy. legally.

i don't give a rat's ass that they "grow up." the damage has already been done to the people who had to be abused by them when they were girls.

clearly you're missing my point about which body parts *i* feel are obscene: fake ones. giant silicone implants, that "cat" woman with the scary face, that "doll" guy on dr phil the other day.

actually, i said the ones playboy bunnies have were obscene

gotta say this: moremarrowdonors is going to get a whole lot of publicity, donors, etc, from this story. there seems to be a little confusion in the comments about the process. what i've gleaned, is that you give a blood or cheek swab sample, and they analyze it and it your info in their database. there are about 8

i'd love to see where you found the info about complications/life expectancy, i couldn't find it on the bone marrow website

jennhames, i registered at a local blood drive. i think that's how a lot of people do. bone marrow matching is one in 20,000, imagine the odds of doing a swap?

the likelihood of this happening would be in the negative numbers. since so few people on the registry are even called, it's not incentive you can count on.

disgustingly, no gays, no UK in the 80s because of mad cow. also no colitis or auto-immune disorders (which is why i can't donate were someone to match me. didn't have these disorders before i went to a drive and donated blood to be on the registry)

@greatnotion i think you've mistaken what i said. i *never* said they were obscene, quite the opposite.

nice grammar, christian tee-shirt people. assuming teaching relative pronouns is less important than teach abstinence

still driving my beloved `94 altima, bought it the day nixon died. am/fm/cassette. it's not working as well as i'd like, and my cassettes are clearly way old, but that altima has the best manufacturer installed stereo i've ever listened to.

@Ladymalaprop: i'll gladly share with you, if i could.

@veronikapaige: come on, why else would he bring up cup size ?

@Monotreme Extraordinaire: it wasn't meant to be rude or absurd, it was meant to shatter this "d-cup myth" that having a d means you have huge breasts. i know how bra sizes work, i know that lines are not standardized. i know how all of this works, and i still can't wrap my head around the fact that the c-cup breasts

"d" cup sweater buddies? that's a hot button for me. does the public/men really know how *small* a d-cup is? it's small. it's not big, in the scheme of women with large, fake breasts that hang around the playboy mansion. dammit, i wish writers/people would stop perpetuating this myth.

no real boots? pajama warmers? this guide isn't for real men, it's for hugh hefner