That would be 112.

Think this is 111.

On the other hand, it would lead to a barrage of mock hyphenated names that might equal the Agent Ouchie Foot awesomeness.

I think the incentives program is clearly a program that deletes from the comments section all the posts about what the incentives program is.

God, I hope not. That is the stupidest, stupidest superhero name in the history of the multiverse.

The monsters bit wasn't as bad as the funk-bringing. And as much as everyone seemed to like it, I thought the Coulson/Fury banter at the end was just hammy. Like the equivalent of villain-monologuing. Not to mention the way all the super-soldiers just waited for Coulson to shoot them with the BFG.

I'm a fan of the show but I'd give it a B- or C+ — but maybe I'm harsh, I expect a little better for a season finale. Seemed rushed, needed to be an extra half-hour. They got into Cybertek way too easily, Paxton's recovery/death was funny but just weird (they needed to show him escaping, etc.), and there were other…

So, all those folks saying Ward didn't kill Buddy, he was trying to save Fitz/Simmons, they were setting him up for a redemption arc … your crow has been set out, salted and peppered for easy consumption ;).

This has been talked about a lot … I think it's pretty clear that Ward killed the dog with the sniper rifle, but it's not 100% clear. Definitely some differences opin' …

Well, I guess we'll see whether they call back to this at all. The only one we see tracking Buddy through a scope before is Ward. And given how loudly F/S are screaming at him Not To Do It, and given his expression as he does it, it really seems to me that it's meant to kill them. Don't see any seeds here at all.…

Because the recaps are right and you are wrong. There is no evidence that Garrett shot the dog, and thematically it makes sense for Ward to have made the shot — especially given what is happening right before and right after that flashback.

Nuh-uh!

I think all your points are good ones, and agree that the more the scene is dissected, the more annoying and illogical it gets/seems. But I truly believe that the goal of the scene is to imply Ward thinks he's sending F/S to their deaths, regardless of how broken it is.

Doubtful. I think there are probably only five or six people that watch it, but they have multiple user names.

Uh-huh!

Of course I do! :) So I guess there's no historical evidence they did that, but it's a common enough urban legend about them that I can see why they put it into the show.

Those people are in denial, Auri … come to the Ward-is-a-jerk dark side! Also, obvious side. The people insisting Ward didn't kill Buddy are starting to sound like Fitz …

Just because he can't do it up-close and personal doesn't mean he's not going to try to do it. Gotta fight that crazy weakness!

What would be confusing is if Garrett was the one who killed the dog, even though 1 second later Ward is the one giving F/S a Sad Face as he dumps them into the ocean. The scene is not displayed as one of "Look, I'm letting you live! I'm sure you'll be fine, because you're the heroes and have a super secret radio…

Just rewatched it — he does not. The dog is in the scope, and then there's what sounds like a gunshot but it's not, it's the (loud) sound of the cargo container being released from the plane. Shooting dog from distance = dumping K/S into the ocean. I think it's a huge stretch to see this as anything but Ward killing…