Yes, but 170hp on 1.4L is 121 hp/L. By contrast, the old SRT-4 made 208hp on 2.4L, a mere 96 hp/L. It's quite a lot more bang for the displacement. Hell, the Challenger R/T only puts out 65 hp/L, which seems like a total waste! (kidding, it's awesome!)

Buy a car, period. I haven't purchased a car in nearly eight years. Everything I've driven since about 2007 has been a freebie or a hand-me-down. The two cars in my driveway right now both belong to my wife since before we got married, and both of those were hand-me-downs from her family! I'm thinking Mazda3 hatch…

Agreed! I had a '97 Dodge 2500 conversion van and it was really nice. But after 195,000 miles it started to become so unreliable (a lot of crank/no-start problems) and difficult to work on (that tiny hood and dog house) that I just donated it the VoA.

Theory #5: Hertz originally purchased a Camaro SS but someone (a shady employee) somehow swapped it out for his/her own 2LT. This most likely would have happened immediately after the car was purchased so no one ever "noticed" the swap.

Ford Ranger "SVT"... twin-turbo V6 (from the SHO?), AWD, and a 6-speed gearbox. Like a Raptor, only smaller and more streetable.