Isn’t it amazing how quickly companies get their shit together when you start threatening their profits.

Notice how it is the left that wants to censor free speech and institute ministry of truth laws where they determine what is relevant news?

So ...

This is where collectivist thinking and identity politics gets you: people who are so intellectually stunted that they see themselves and others as nothing but herd members instead of individuals.

How they are not calling this a hate crime I have no idea... imagine the roles being reversed and it was a black man having this done to him by a bunch of white shit heads... it would immediately be called a hate crime. Replace “fuck trump” with “fuck obama” and “fuck white people” with “fuck black people”. This is…

Here is an honest question. Can someone explain to me why Chicago, you know, the home of our President, is such a shit hole?

This woud be a great article to bring up the Liberal Muslim that said she was attacked by Trump supporters yet lied.

Obama supporters in Obama’s backyard.

Fucking nigger’s torturing a vulnerable person, ANY vulnerable person.

Maybe this will finally open up the can of worms that is black on white violent crime.

Why did this take so long to get up and why is it buried on Gizmodo?

Two things:

This makes no sense.

I don’t even know where to start picking at this. I feel like a cat with a ball of yarn. You obviously have either not left your tiny little box where you live to actually see the world, or chose to ignore it.

Because it doesn’t fit the Carlos Slim mandate that all Gawker-Ghost posts must clearly state that Trump is a 100% evil poopy-head.

Why did you exclude this part of Cook’s post? Is it because Trump and Cook may share similar thoughts about it?

You mean the FBI that let Hillary Clinton off the hook for her little email scandal? Seems legit.

Does it occur to you that a story can be told without a characters sexual preference being revealed or is necessary? There are tons of characters in the show who we don’t know are straight or gay. Would it make you happy if someone pointed out that they were gay and that’s it?

Shows should have homosexual, bisexual,…

You needed a queer person on the show for it become watchable to you?

My question is, why it’s considered a negative portrayal for a bisexual person to enjoy multiple partners at once. The monoamorous framework of modern romance means that in order to experience any sort of commitment, a bisexual person has to deny a part of their sexual identity. Why is adhering to this a good thing?