greatkingkoopa
KingKoopa
greatkingkoopa

It’s legos where you don’t pay per brick.

And he takes it a step further because the real balls and then some loaner balls for it to be the 3rd run that sells it. I mean, B run had some nice additions, and the extra scenes were pure love, but to hide it behind yet another????

It’s kind of the entire point. This game is full of obfuscation, meant to let you figure it out through your own desire and volition. This is why you can see all the half-assed reviews stopped when they reached ending A. It’s like a test, maybe? It’s certainly in line with the theme of the game (which you’ll more

This is a touching and harrowing story - thank you for sharing it. All the best to you and your wife.

You made a reference to “brain burn” in the third-to-last paragraph - I can maybe guess from the context, but what exactly does this mean?

Perhaps this marks a call to all game reviewers to only review what can be efficiently reviewed about a game. If you only have 1 day to post a review, it better be a damn good review of the first baby missions and maybe some side tracking. I really don’t want to read a review coming from a reviewer who had to rush the

I was actually happy not to have any impressions going into Prey. I trusted Arkane Studios, and reviews these days only serve to cast shade on your personal experience with a game (“Am I really having fun? This game is only 80% on Metacritic...”)

Meanwhile, the original Prey sits at an 83.

No, technically we are encoded to the nice savannahs in a narrow strip of Africa. Outside of there, we use our intelligence and tool-making skills to survive.

Look, if someone spends 700 hours doing something and then goes on to say that the activity isn’t worth anyone’s time, then there’s a logical disconnect there. Either they got some joy out of it, or they foolishly wasted their own time. Either way, that makes their judgement questionable.

700 hours is a lot of time to spend doing something you 1) Don’t have to do, 2) don’t enjoy doing, and 3) are not being paid to do.

Right?? All reviewers should have to spend at least 700-1000 hours minimum before they are allowed to offer an opinion. I’m still not ready to post my review of Pac Man.

To give some perspective, 700 hours would be roughly four months of a full-time (40 hour per week) job.

These are all reasons why it would be fine to listen to someone who had played 20-40 hours.

So now I’m waiting for someone who will plug in only one controller, put on each of those internal monitors Demon’s Souls, Dark Souls I, Dark Souls II and Dark Souls III and finish them all simultaneously without dying :D

I really wanna check out Birthdays the Beginning, looks interesting and haven’t found a good sim I really got hooked on since Viva Pinata

Their handle is “Offenditron”. Whether or not they actually believe what they say, their goal is to get a response.

Wario’s chilling with Mega Man and the Belmonts.

This is very nostalgic to me. Super Mario Land 2 was the first game I ever played, received it together with a game boy from my father first time we were going abroad. That, together with Wario Land 1 and 2 is the reason why I got into games in the first place.

Yeah this, basically. Everyone wants to find a “trick”. There is no trick. Like everything else in life, you get out of it what you put into it.

Definitely eat more plants and vegetables. Eat more whole grains. Refined sugar intake will most likely decrease as a result. But if it doesn’t? You lose weight when you eat less than you use; if your goal is weight loss, then do that, and you’re gold.