graysmith-old
Graysmith
graysmith-old

Ah yes, I really want to stay at a hotel that invites people to ransack it in order to steal something. That really makes me feel safe and comfortable staying at your establishment.

It's not that bad. People are probably just bitching about it because it's different and as such confusing until they know their way around. Those things don't necessarily equal bad design. There are some annoyances (getting to a tweet's permalink is more of a hassle now since you have to "open" a tweet and then click

You can't really compare a proper book to a scrap of paper that most people will throw away five minutes after printing and having a look at it. Books, for the most part, are worth the paper they're printed on as they have lasting value. This? Not so much. It's really cute, fun and all, but it's a gimmick that

Who is Gary Smith?

No, I'm just being sarcastic.

Also, I'm shocked no one has made this pun yet:

Pretty sure no one who reads Gizmodo has ever gotten laid so I don't know why this post even exists.

Looks cool but why are the pods on the inside (other than for purely aesthetic reasons)? It seems like they're trading purpose (viewing platform) for aesthetics. You'd surely get a much better view if they were on the outside (which is where they are on just about all other giant ferris wheels and for good reasons).

Actually, what you'd really want to do is get your parents/grandparents to switch to Chrome since Chrome (at least the Mac version) updates itself and doesn't even launch any pop-ups alerting you about it. As long as they close and restart it with some regularity (my parents tend to close the browser after each use)

If you think Grand Central Terminal is "The Worst" (which it totally isn't, at all, on any level, even at its busiest) you've clearly never visited the eyesore hellhole that is Penn Station. GCT wouldn't even be in the top 100 of worst places in NYC, unless you have agoraphobia.

Spending 7 bucks on subscriptions to games you won't be able to play next month unless you pay again versus buying 7 new games per month at $0.99 a pop.. I don't see how this won't fail spectacularly unless their games are amazing (which I wouldn't know anything about). And that's not even taking the boneheaded

I don't think that many ASSUMED they'd get a newest-gen nano in return, I think most were just HOPING that they would, thinking that maybe it'd cost Apple more to refurb all these antiques instead of just sending out new ones. I was certainly excited at the prospect that maybe it'd be a new one, but I was definitely

It's not really much of an improvement if you still have to look like the Michelin man. Admittedly, the jacket in the picture doesn't look nearly as bad as down jackets do, but it still looks terrible. You'd only want to wear that if you're all alone in the arctic wilderness where style doesn't matter.

The giant grids seem to be for wind turbines. I spotted these turbines already built in the same area as the other grids. Zoom in and you can see by their shadow that they're wind turbines.

According to CNET's article, the replacement is another 1G nano, not a new touchscreen nano. A bit surprised Apple will bother refurbishing all those antiques instead of just sending out new ones, but then again when people know they just get another antique back there probably won't be all that many sending them in,

Is there any kind of time limit on this replacement program? I have a 1G nano, I checked it on their site and I'm eligible.. But I don't know if I want to bother with this if you just get a refurbished 1G nano back, especially since the one I have is personalized. On the other hand, if you get a latest-gen touchscreen

In binary 1111 11 11 11 means 15 3 3 3. #corrections

£10,000? You could get better funding than that on Kickstarter.