You do realize that you clowns would be up in arms about the dehumanizing and Nazi-esque language of “canceling” a human being if the shoe were on the other foot, right?

No.

“Do something”? What are they proposing here? What exactly are they expecting the runners for a presidential race to “do”? Is there a policy proposal we can actually take a look at here, or is this really as worthless as it seems?

Your understanding of history seems to be roughly equal to your understanding of grammar.

Your understanding of history seems to be roughly equal to your understanding of grammar.

when the room is fascism.

Do you seriously want our fucking phone assistants to start weighing in on anything political? Do you people actually think these things through, or do you just react?

why the hell anyone under the age of 40 should trust him or anyone else of his generation.

“explosive transphobic, fatphobic comments made by an executive”

Ridiculous, laughable people out on the fringes who have tiny platforms online but who nobody actually takes seriously? Yeah, I guess they do.

Seriously. It’s fucking ridiculous, and also weirdly culturally insensitive.

Ah, unfounded conspiracy theories. Of course.

Less than three hours later

a man accused by several women of sexual misconduct

That costs extra money, so they don’t.

What he said was xenophobic, no question. Ugly stuff. But racist? I wouldn’t rule out racism as a factor possibly motivating the comment, but the statement itself is simply not racist. If you think that it is, then we must be using two different definitions of the word.

That guy’s a piece of shit, but the guy sucker punching him and then is no better. You don’t want to live in a society where this is acceptable. You’re thinking and acting like children.

First of all, “no one” is just two words. It’s not that complicated.

Well this article was absolute drivel, but the following really stuck out to me for some reason:

Both narratives are constructed using the same terrible playbook—an airtight defense disguised as testimony, created with the presupposition that its author will not be believed. It’s a playbook that’s becoming common, because the presupposition is correct.