They probably knew this was going to be a controversy. How could they not? I'm guessing this is a publicity stunt, and it worked. Good for them.
They probably knew this was going to be a controversy. How could they not? I'm guessing this is a publicity stunt, and it worked. Good for them.
A post which implied that men are "pervy" simply for being old? I'm not someone who even likes the word misandry, but if you imply that a man is pervy simply for being old, then yes, you are a misandrist.
Uhhh ok?
Are you implying that Jack Nicholson is a rapist?
I have learned to take it as a given that the more you learn about someone, the more sympathetic they will become. If Jack Nicholson intimately knows Roman Polanski, then it is not surprising that he has sympathy for him.
Did he actually provide it for those things, or did Polanski just use it for those things? Huge difference there.
You very clearly implied that he "hosted" the rape, which means you implied he was in on the rape. I don't see it as an eyeroll-worthy comment to simply ask if he actually was in on the rape. I suppose the concept of wrongfully destroying someone's reputation doesn't bother you, but it does bother me.
So liking beautiful adult women makes a man pervy now. Okay. I'm not a fan of this word but.... misandry.
Is there evidence that he knew the rape was going to happen?
George Zimmerman is Mestizo. Erasing mixed identities for your own political agenda is racist and oppressive.
There's something funny about the word AIDS. I can't put my finger on why.
Sacco is a common jewish name....
The word racist is losing all meaning to me. It used to identify behaviour that actually caused real issues in society. Now it identifies any behaviour that we falsely scapegoat as being the cause of black failure.
Let's all pretend we never say anything offensive!!!
I think some of the MRA complaints about feminism are misrepresented a bit. I don't think they are all about wanting women to be subservient to men. There are some actual effects that are quite bad for men that are the result of certain feminist actions and movements. For example:
Exactly, and I see feminism as valid, but it is about women's issues, not about egalitarianism.
A human person who volunteered themselves to be seen naked. It's not as if the participants get to own and control her body. They just get to see it, and she most likely got a fair pay to do this.
I've always considered the egalitarian definition to be more of a PR front than a reality. I don't think the reality is bad, but it just seems clear that most feminists are about women's issues, and making life better for women, whether it's related to equality or not. For example, abortion is considered a feminist…
What false equivalence? I don't consider myself an MRA or a feminist btw, but I agree with both groups on some issues.