he didn’t get all of his stuff stolen, they just charged him more in russian (or some other single currency, maybe yugoslavian money), he had numerous currencies, and they didn’t appear to rob his entire bag.

we aren’t all stupid about this, but the more skeptical of us certainly are likely to get less sex. and the way she’s acting towards a guy like that, who’s completely full of himself, tends to work just fine.

CIA is certainly ruthless, but having fake shit that hurts the thief if stolen isn’t ruthless. if you are a thief and you cause yourself really bad consequences from what you stole you deserve every little bit of it (i’m not a u.s. defender, just logic)

exactly, anybody claiming the u.s. doesn’t do stuff EXACTLY as bad as intentionally starting famines just needs to read more history.

that was already answered to oleg in past season(s). u.s. did intentionally make a worthless propeller blade in order for russians to steal it, BUT it only killed people since russians were so stupid as to rush it into production, had they done more months/weeks of research they’d have quickly learned it didn’t fit…

why exactly would this “ruin” the show. they aren’t making a documentary here.

“the CIA killed nina” huh, do you watch this show?

umm, liz and phil (and stan at least close to it) are the very definition of “grown up boomers” they were the generation born just after WW2. their kids are x’ers born of boomer parents

suicides tend to NOT involve breaking a bottle in the back of your own head.

she flat out told her she’d be going to the cops which would most certainly get liz’s fake identity if it were real in trouble from some sort of guilt. she was clearly open about having a emotional release at the expense of liz’s fake identity, which, as far as lisa knows, is a real person.

extroaordinarily bright light in a place that never has any light was a kinda huge tip off.

biologically even if she was younger no, it’s a social construct to even think being attracted to anybody is “wrong”. meanwhile here, that actress wasn’t underage when this was filmed anyway, so socially you would feel fine by the legal stuff and societal norms and such.

if the way he was able to F nina is “game” you need to adjust your definition of that term. that’s evil. sandra and mcnulty’s ex sure, they should count towards that though.

it absolutely would be better to do it the way they did it, large risk possibly for anybody going into russia from germany

people in this country mostly never had logic education, so they live their entire lives in some cases actually believing that since they feel it it’s completely valid. then when somebody else clashes with that they lean on something to the effect of just insulting the person clashing with them, so that person is a…

todd literally had no indication of being a white supremacist in BB. his UNCLE and crew were of course (but even that might have been mostly for prison connections), he was just one of their criminal crew as far as we knew. todd in fact didn’t appear to have ANY philosophical/political leanings, that seemed to be the…

this is at least congruent with somebody who might actually believe a politician’s sound bite to conform to any real life state of affairs.

yr straight up kidding about using a sound bite to mean anything at all about the actual stuff reagan’s regime actually did right?

smoking weed with somebody who wants to smoke weed (and he told her it’s stronger than she’d be used to) isn’t how “dosing” is usually used. she was aware of it and wanted it.

love seeing this stuff, takes me back to aesthetics school. this whole thing stems from them simply not realizing the definitions of objective vs subjective and that’s all it is.