how is everybody missing the point that ellie may’s testimony about killing delroy isn’t worth anything unless delroy’s body could be found. wouldn’t have been MUCH easier for boyd/ava to just get rid of that evidence? you can’t try somebody for murder without a corpse, no matter how many witnesses there might be.

it’s only semi-edible when adding cheap scotch or whiskey to it.

a quote from catch 22 the book that line is.

most midwesterners sound nothing like people in north dakota or minnesota. that’s whether rural, urban or in the middle.

this is a good response, and since Luhnow is supposedly some high level mind in this sport, the most interesting point of the whole story is his stupidity in it. Also it’s pretty obvious that Correa’s bosses didn’t know he was doing this, as i’d assume they aren’t stupid enough to think he wouldn’t get caught doing…

no, it’s just different than having to break down the door or pick the lock, the door was wide open. it’s still trepassing, but i’m pretty sure if you rob somebody’s house whose door is wide open it’s not same level of theft as picking in the door or breaking in the window etc.

my point exactly, he broke into a wide open door house, with at best a weak claim he had been robbed earlier by the owner of the house.

yep, this has been called “digital espionage”, but STL should try to hide behind the “child” defense. Basically if a 5 year old can “hack” your computer since you were too stupid to change your password (twice actually since he didn’t have some underling change his email either) it’s still a crime, but not on par with…