goobermunch
Goobermunch
goobermunch

Anyone who responds to this with “boys will be boys” is okay with the idea that we’re destroying our girls.  

I saw a comment from someone last night that said “This is the behavior of a party that hopes they’re never going to have to face a fair election again.”

“Literally no difference between Trump and Clinton . . . .”

The being Grassley’s negotiating with doesn’t traffic in dollars. Souls are its currency and misery its stock in trade.

No, but when you cook lamb shanks in your Instant Pot, you will be a step closer to achieving enlightenment.

The issue is the use of the word “free.” You’re thinking of “free” as in beer. She’s thinking of “free” as in puppies.  As in they’re not buying it, but we’ll be paying for it and cleaning up the ensuing shit for years to come.

We just finished watching this (again) with our seven year-old son.

Happens to me all the time, but only when I can’t find the Doritos. But then, it’s like, “fine, I’ll have some Fritos, and pass the bean dip. Ooh, is that a jar of onion dip? Where’re the Ruffles. Dude. Ridges.

The screen headed people are robots from Saga. Go buy the whole run and read it now. You’ll thank me later.

Millions of Cubs fans crying out to whatever eldritch powers were listening.... “Please, please, I don’t care what happens to the world, just let the Cubs win!”

From Wikipedia:

It really wasn’t carved out of an MMO.

If you listen, he clearly says he’s auctioning her phone off.

5 more and you’ll have Kinkos.

Ah.  You beat me to it.

It’s more complicated than that. Technically, under Section 1983 (that’s the statute where you an sue the government for depriving you of a Constitutional right), there is no theory of “respondeat superior” liability. “Respondeat superior” is the legal theory under which an employer is liable for the unlawful

So suits under 42 USC Sec. 1983 have differing standards depending on which rights are alleged to have been infringed. For example, if you’re claiming that the state violated your rights under the 4th Amendment, you have to show that you were subjected to a search or seizure that was “objectively unreasonable.” This

Oooh! It’s like the plural noun thing.

You’re good people. I’d buy you a beer if I could.