This reflects reality 0% accurately. Good for you, though.

If moronic self-righteousness could pay for tuition, Libby’s got the DACA kids covered.

> You couldn’t have wealthy parasites like Bezos

Fuuuuuck you

They do realize this is not a real workplace? Like, actual employees aren’t being harassed in absence of an HR department. These are TV employees.

I can’t understand why everyone is taking a dump on Wahlberg for negotiating a higher wage from his employer. This is completely insane. Would you work for free? Better yet, wouldn’t you actively encourage a worker, and especially a female worker, to seek the maximum possible wage they can from their billionaire…

Why is everyone pissed at Wahlberg about this article? Would you work for free? If your employer, with billions of dollars, asked you to do extra work and you were in a position of leverage, wouldn’t you demand to be paid? And if you had a coworker who, for whatever reason, decided to work for free, then do you…

this wasn’t supposed to be another goddamn opportunity for a white guy to profit unjustly.

And if it is the case that she decided not to negotiate for more money, there’s no reason it should be off-limits for Wahlberg to demand to be paid for his time. This article is implying that since they got paid different dollar amounts for the reshoot, this must be due to some gender and/or race-based discrimination…

this wasn’t supposed to be another goddamn opportunity for a white guy to profit unjustly.

Hashtag StayInYourLane AM I RITE?

> Yes, it’s true. Tucker Carlson is right. I hate white people.

The absence of any logical reasoning here never ceases to amaze. Hoda and Savannah making less than Lauer is no more evidence of gender wage disparity than a snowy day is evidence that global warming is a hoax.

Instead, the league that wants some 70 percent African-American playersto risk their lives chasing a damn ball but doesn’t want them to protest black death at the hands of police will run seven games at 1 p.m. and nine games at 4:25 p.m.

1. Where does the > 90% figure come from?

In isolation I might think this too, but after considering the other requirements this is not my reading. There seems to be a theme against entitled pricks (the rules against gifts from parents) and against vanity (e.g. clothes/handbags over $500). To me, the makeup thing falls under that second category.

Do you mean to suggest that the administration of a competition that women enter for the purpose of showing off their bodies is being judgmental about its contestants’ bodies?

Oh, don’t thenk me. Thenk you!

Man I am sick and tired of all these Powerful White Men committing workplace sexual harassment.

This is some racist bullshit.