Why? Am I missing context, or are you blocking him for quoting Pareene in a way that, correctly, makes him look like an asshole? If so, why is it okay to silence critics?

IMO it’s just the way it looks. The author is so high and mighty that he, a blogger mind you, believes that he has the societal stature to accuse, without a hint of irony, a U.S. Senator (i.e. someone with an actual job) of doing nothing useful.

FTFY:

And from the other side of the equation, I’d add: How do you determine who pays?

m

Thank God the Trump-Bannon-Putin administration is here to protect us from WARMONGER HILLARY CLINTON! Emails that kill.

go fuck yourself.

Some even become president

Steve Kerr didn’t suggest any of this whatsoever. He talked only about the ban. You are putting words in his mouth, or at least pretending that you are simply continuing a thought that he was already articulating, which is not true.

Well there you have it folks. I couldn’t have given a better definition of Identity Politics than this.

Yep. There are many things he could do to dispel most of this suspicion, like releasing his tax returns. But he chooses not to, which has to make us wonder what he’s hiding.

While this is troubling, the salient question as far as legitimacy is concerned is whether Trump or his campaign was working with Russia in order to influence the election.

On paper wouldn’t Falcons-Packers seem more entertaining than Pats-Steelers? Or at least one could reasonably make that case.

Sexist. We should strive for a society where women are judged by their ideas and not what they wear. Jezebel is part of the patriarchy.

Actually, categorically declaring people racist when they may not be appears to be a much more common impulse.

Actually I think this is exonerating evidence, if anything. It seems she believed that the relationship between chicken & waffles and black culture is analogous to margaritas/tacos and Mexican culture, and did not know about the connotations or the history.

Fine. They are lunatics on the street screaming at me and wearing costumes. Doesn’t change why one would be reluctant to engage.

Man, it’s almost as if rich people are just evil by definition: If they hold onto their wealth, they’re evil. If they give away their wealth, it must be for some evil purpose, and therefore, they’re evil.

Stopped reading.

lol. Didn’t even strike me until you pointed it out but I had a good laugh. Anyway, didn’t anticipate having an interesting discussion in a comment section, which is cool. Especially involving Matt Garza, of all people. Have a good one.