The very sobre BBC Radio 4 Today program just had a long discussion, essentially concluding that on the balance of probabilities Trump is, in fact, a compromised Russian agent.

Fuck off and find your bridge, troll.

Debunked in the sense of “not debunked, and now receiving multiple 3rd party support from various global intelligence agencies”?

This is the scariest thing. We are now very saddened and scared by Carson’s answers and testimony. There were points during the hearing that emails were exchanged multiple times in minutes as reactions to what he said.

Yeah it sucks that Booker voted against this amendment, but let’s not forget the overall bill is designed to kill the ACA. I don’t want to fall into the “yeah, but see? Dems are just as bad!” trap on this one.

Note the part where I said “I think”.

I don’t know, man. After Nixon’s embarrassing resignation, the Republicans still controlled the Executive Branch for 14 of the next 20 years.

I don’t think any reasonable person doubts that those things would be far less likely under Clinton.

You think some people on Tumblr push a narrative that has the same level of national influence as something like the NC bathroom bill?

Yeah. It would be like me thinking the defining attribute of conservative thought is that they believe we should all be able to carry M16s in the street. Of course it’s not true. Many conservatives have nuanced thought on gun control that differ from liberals. Unfortunately, I think the less educated conservative…

Don’t fucking read them then, Jesus Tit Fucking Christ. What’s wrong with you people that make the decision to read, then bitch and moan about it. It’s literally your own doing, knock it the fuck off, you special little snowflake. And yes I can give a flying fuck or monkeys ass if you find this offensive, I find…

The funny thing is, right-wingers bought more guns ‘cause O’Bummer was comin’ for ‘em. I’m buying more guns because Trump’s people are coming for *me.*

What’s the conflicting viewpoint here, that corruption is good and the public should be kept in the dark about the activities of the president?

Our norms are not strong enough to withstand a concentrated assault by two branches of government (and, when Ginsburg leaves the court, all 3).

I don’t understand what’s ironic about writing about a presidential candidate and then continuing to write about that individual once they’re elected. Help me out here?

Glad someone is pointing this out. Surprised it’s not getting more coverage.

Get off the couch, tie your shoes.

Jeez, did America Fail American History.

CNN willingness to accept the false of equivalency of “they’re both the same” was the breaking point for me. Letting lies just flow out of a talking head and ending each debate with “Well, whaddya gonna do? Agree to disagree...” made my stomach literally ache. Haven’t watched them since.

When a powerful U.S. Senator is delivering copies of Pizzagate conspiracy theory manifestos to the director of the FBI, this equivalence will become valid.