that pic.....tongue.

I would trade my ‘11 outback on it today if it were here just to lose the cladding and jacked up stance.

Hopefully that 2.2 doesn’t drink oil the way the 3.2 V6 does, I could hardly keep up with it between fillups.

CP, I would rather have this for much less if I am looking for a 70s land barge.

Sconsin

another good reason to pay cash.

Cheap, reliable, slow, and loads of fun off road.

If I had your skills, I wouldn’t think twice about having the Audi instead of my outback. Nice ride.

Ex-Justy owner myself, what a fun little car as a kid. Amazing abuse it took over it’s lifetime. Got rid of it too soon.

I forgot, wicked cool donuts in winter.

I have a 2011 and it does everything I need it to. It is a pig off the line but I would argue once it is underway the CVT makes better use of the 2.5 than any conventional auto would. I get great gas mileage and it is mainly my commuter car to work and back. Works great in Wisconsin winters and hauls the wife, two…

Subaru Justy

agreed

It looks a ton better than a subaru but, never again will a VW darken my driveway, hence subaru.

Oh yawn, he will resurface somewhere else to continue his hilarity.

I would be hard pressed to ever buy another VW no matter what they bring to these shores. They are dead to me.

I think yearly emission tests can make old beater cars problematic.

NP, great beater car.

It is literally the only thing I know about the Mint 400.