It looks like the assumption is that voters will refuse to vote for people who repeatedly try to circumvent the constitution. Which was possibly true enough for the first handful of elections. Now I’m not sure if it’s ignorance, apathy or malice, but it seems to actually be something voters like- unless it’s one…

I didn’t order you to do anything, moron. I have done nothing- nothing- but repeatedly ask you to do the bare fucking minimum of telling me what you think I’m wrong about and why. That’s all.

You still, after all this, havebyet to say even once what you think I’m wrong about and why you think I’m wrong. Hard to reflect upon why I’m wrong when you haven’t told me what I’m wrong about. Seriously, go back to my original post and read through it. You’ll find I am right about that, and that your posts read like…

The thing you’ve kept secret is what you are talking about. Do you do this at McDonalds? Argue that the cashier should know what you want instead of simply telling them? My original statement held no controversial opinions, merely a simple, factual statement. You have so far proven unable to offer any counter…

I shouldn’t have to. You should be able to use clear language to explain that statement. It’s easy. Just go up to my original statement and copy/ paste the statement you take issue with. If you cannot, we can safely assume you have no idea what you have no idea what you’re talking about.

And if you’d actually spend a moment telling me what the hell you’re talking about, then we’d both have a lot more time. Being cryptic and hurling insults doesn’t mean you win the argument. It just makes everyone reading this think you’re an imbecile incapable of making a clear statement.

Again, what would that be, specifically? Because I have a strong feeling that you’re arguing against an opinion I’ve never expressed. But since you’re unwilling/ unable to tell me what that is, I can’t say for certain. Is saying what you mean actually that difficult for you?

Why do you assume he brought the gun specifically in case he lost the game? Maybe he’s just read too many news stories about how dangerous Florida is. Also you do know that there’s plenty of people who carry concealed firearms without a permit right?

What obvious fact can’t I accept? I prefer coherent, complete arguments to half- baked nonsense.

Well almost none of them are natural blonds, so they really just need a cruel- looking woman tree.

Rub my nose in what? Refusing to make assumptions?

One of the basic problems with guns is that people tend not to buy things they don’t expect to use. So if you’re buying something intended to be used to kill....

I understand anger at losing, especially so early, but just what kind of mindset dictates that you destroy other people’s lives in revenge?

Compared to the average GOP congressperson, voting along the party line only 95% of the time is practically playing for the other side.

The only buried heads are the ones who refuse to consider any solution other than gun control.

Over on Kotaku’s story about this, at least one person jumped straight to blaming gamers, and video game tournaments.Which is interesting because I don’t recall any other shootings at game tournaments, and the giant DOTA Tournament in Vancouver just finished without anything of the sort.

“Unoffensive” is such a criminally low bar. I want great, or at least good. Nuts to unoffensive.

I wonder if these folks are equally upset about all the land being seized from white farmers in United States to build pipelines through.

Just here to try to keep the balls rolling.

If you think the US does all the drug researching in the world, and everyone else just gets the benefits, then you don’t know how pharmaceutical research works. Not in the slightest. It’s done by everyone, all over the world, and is heavily subsidized by governments all over the world.