The title made me chuckle. I’m not sure if our civilization will survive to ourselves in the next 100-200 years, surviving 1000 years is really improbable, and for 10000, 100000 and a million may have some descendant, but maybe our kind of technological intelligence might have gone for good.

I’m confused. The ones that perpetrated Exodus: Gods and Kings weren’t Savages?

Going to other solar systems may be out of our reach in the foreseable future, and so terraforming other planets/moons. But maybe there are ways to make self-sustaining habitats (in pure space, other planets, moons, asteroids and even here). There are stages we need to reach till getting there, like space mining, and…

We have records that tells us that it not always been, and probably won’t be for long, a “perfect homeland”. In fact, we can’t wait till things get wrong by themselves so we are hurrying up things now.

Ignorant nonsense is denying what science has already demostrated. Is what we know so far, the solid ground we stand on. We can add a narrative, what we think that it will be nice to happen without any basis on that, hoping that in the future somewhat what we know and its being corroborated each day is somewhat false…

Of the two, maybe Jessica Jones. I have no previous memory of the original work to destroy.

The Dickian moment of the book was not showing how would be the world if the Axis won the world. Was that neither that reality nor ours were the “real” way that things actually happened.

Naming storms make sense because you can have several the same year. But for things that happens every N years attaching just the year will make it unique enough

Is natural, is oscilating between low and high activity... but it pushed the whole planet far closer to the supposedly “end of the century” 2ºC warming limit. And global warming is about keeping more heat, so we won’t lose that extra heat, and are several steps closer to the cliff than before.

Admit it. You will see this movie only to watch Butler yell “THIS IS EGYPT!”

That electricity passed through Kara’s midichlor... i mean, kriptonian cells. That is science! respect it

None is the right answer. I’ve seen what hollywood and turning into movies in general does to works that i used to love. Not getting a movie adaptation is an advantage.

Yes, but not sure how much of that if any ends colonizing the guts.

Thats why is so important to breastfeed your children. At early age, our stomach is not so acidic so our mother’s milk and the bacteria it carries primes our gut biome. It changes with time, adapting to the stage and even health of the infant.

No one else noticed the guy with the face hidden behind a flower pot when they were reporting that Maxwell Lord was abducted by Reactron?

Of recent years i would say Charles Stross’s Accelerando. If well I don’t think that it is an accurate prediction of our future (not even nor near one) the rythm of change on that book hit a nerve. My vision of the world started to take into account accumulative and increasingly fast changes in how the world is and…

Was Barry’s actor blinded in real life to do his part? Looked very natural on that in the lab at the very least.

For me still the elephant in the room are Man of Steel’s fights in every episode, just in small scale just because they wanted. Every single fight she is in should level a city, not so much because what she wants, but because the evil ones may want or just not care.

That’s look a lot like the argument behind Greg Egan’s Diaspora.

Something that was suggested in Enterprise (that didn’t actually saw) are Time wars. And given the split on the new movies on the timeline, a priority must be fix that kind of intrusions, specially in an universe where seem that easy to go back in time and change something big.