She is not suing the other hotels. Why no one knows. As for the perp, he’s spending 30 months in prison. The only reason I might think Marriott could win is because I don’t see EA proving her case. There was no negligence on the part ofmthenhotel and there are no provable damages other then her chastity.

You see, unlike you I’m not concerned about looking cool to the gawker Borg collective.

No one knows how This may play out in the jury room, but it seems with the perps recorded deposition to police it craters claims about the hotels culpability. Also, considering the defenses withering case about her non existent loss of earnings it now comes down to emotion.

Because he requested suite #1027. He didn't ask for the room adjacent to Her.

Are you claiming gawker media has a conservative bias?

The jurors will never hear about it and if they do the defense will have cause to request a mistrial.

Considering that Marriott never voluntarily gave the room number, that they never voluntarily put him in a adjacent room at his request to be next to her, what liability do they have?

Huh?

Agreed. If he did show that video at atar after his testimony, he’s a scum.

A videod deposition to police?

I’m not your pool boy. Google the perps name and “deposition”.

No, unlike 98% of gawker regulars I read more than one gossip site a day.

Marriott will win that legal point.

Google the perps name and “deposition”.

A 2.5 hour video deposition of the perp was played to jurors, many news outlets referenced parts of it.

How did he hurt his companies case?

How politically edgy of you.

The only mudslinging is coming from sites like gawker media.

You don’t know much about the law, do you.

Why should it go in front of the jury?