The professor’s name? Albert Einstein.

Yikes, bad takes. Marrying a rapist, pushing anti-vax bs, it is a problem for anyone to work with 6is9ine - don’t start that whataboutism bs, supporting her brother (posting bail and funding his defense isn’t support?), there is proof of their harassment of the person accusing him of rape. She’s not a good person.

Maybe she’s tired of being called a whore by unnamed supposedly feminist websites?

Sounds like you misplaced your glasses. Or you are being an ageist and sexist jerk. Hopefully it’s the former but safe money is on the latter. 

Why is being mindful of what you're eating such an inherently terrible thing? I have type 2 diabetes, and if I'm going to treat myself, it had to be worth it. Chocolate mousse is worth it, a Hershey bar is not. This feels like outrage for the sake of outrage. But of course, you got me to read and comment on it...

Sorry, I misunderstood what you wrote. I thought you were saying he said that. I didn’t get that you were saying the last line of the article implied that. ETA: He’s said terrible things to his first wife (“I’m the alpha in this relationship,” on their wedding night). That’s where my confusion came from.

I agree with your assessment of how this was written. Clearly meant to be “edgy”, but only succeeding at making the author look insensitive and biased at best. I don’t care for Elon Musk and while I do think he and his soon to be ex-bride aren’t undeserving of crits, this didn’t land well. Not at all. 

I mean, the issue here isn’t the policy itself; everybody knows that aid to Israel is a slam dunk to get through Congress. It’s that AOC compromised on her principles on an issue that’s been important to her in the past, and in a way that she’s criticized other politicians for doing ... for no visible reason other…

Yeah, but that would have been bad… wanting it for everyone is the wrong direction. 

Afghanistan had a government that, whatever its faults, guaranteed equal rights for women.

Hell, I’ll settle for recognizing that encouraging a culture of “just tell the cops what you know” and “they should search his house immediately” could potentially be used disproportionately against people of color. This site and commentators go from ACAB to Copraganda real quick.

Counter-argument: it actually feels like the vast majority of winners were deserved. The only big one I dispute is Gillian Anderson. As much as I love her, I wasn’t a fan of the portrayal and that sort of role is a far bigger sin for me than lack of diversity. Play a famous prime minister on the Crown, win an Emmy.

“My government has done horrible things. But at least they’re elected, and there’s some accountability.”

You really need to calm down. This kind of rhetoric isn’t helping anyone.

You have to be a troll. 

How exactly am I “defending murder” by saying that at the time of her disappearance, no one knew anything aside from she was missing?

The dress was very corny and I question the faculties of anyone who thinks her wearing it to the fucking Met Gala genuinely constitutes speaking truth to power (“Tax the Rich”? No, not exactly!) but the second those pictures dropped you could just feel the excitement of people on all sides of the discourse readying…

OK, but statutory rape IS a legal definition. It doesn’t excuse anything, but is important to note, just as it would be important to note if she was under the age of consent and it was statutory rape.

Right.
It’s almost like newspapers are supposed to present all the facts of a story and let you make your own opinion rather than curate the information and present only what fits their authorial bias...

The Post has to point out the actual age of consent to make it clear she is not accusing someone of a legal crime, just a moral one.