*actually its pretty common in the USA - where I am is actually classified "village" - for example here

only six comments though holy crap . . . and I clicked this long after the post

*and because... BENGHAZI !!! !!!

HAHAHAHHA - hey to each their own I - I am not judging You !

pretty sure that is the main point of doing this shit. . .

*what is this shit a handgun purchase ? fuck these guys !

*Spring Breakers 2. . .

*there is a stripper pole in the living room of a Spirit Airlines "crash pad" next to the Ft. Lauderdale airport . . . just saying - lol !

*well that clears up one mystery now doesn't it?

some states require that as an option - as well as distributing any and all video evidence involved in a case to ANY person who makes a request for it.

"not all celebrities"

thats weird - but so go all fundamentalist people - maybe it was done out of concern for them in some warped sense of radical balance huh ? anyway thankYou for replying : )

*action initiated by HiveMind

MuthaHolyFather. . . be careful on that shit...

again wtf exactly are You saying here I do not understand and will not speculate - but as YOU are the first comment - inquiring minds will want to know....? wo wtf are You saying here ?

*see my comment toward him and lemme know Your take on what I offered if You can please : )

so if I happen to have photos of myself that meet this criteria and they are determined watchable by a website promoter - I am wrong to do that then? I want to understand how this constitutes approval beyond preference for those who clicked the site toward unhealthy body stereotypes? What is unhealthy about exposing…

actually a name like that would get a lot of click volumizer link makers interested - which the promoter may have been into avoiding ?