. Non educated white people are being disingenuous if they pretend to not understand “white” as a sociological concept, because as that article pointed out, each and every one of their ancestors fought tooth and nail for the title and they all openly revel in its benefits. keep “non educated POC” out of your mouth…

ok great that’s your prerogative. I don’t think Higher Education should be modeled after that

But you have to be specific to an individual, or individuals. You can’t just make a blanket statement like that. Would you consider Charles Murray or even Milo to be in the same league as someone like Andrew Anglin? I wouldn’t.

https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html

I like show and tell. Here’s mine.

Oh ok, then who are you referring to specifically and show me the quote where they are advocating for mass murder?

This should be super easy, seeing as how there so many Nazis in America in 2018, which individuals specifically fall under the umbrella of mass murder advocates so we can start actually sussing this out…

Which one specifically and give me a quote. Milo? Charles Murray?

“It implies that A) We’ve never had higher tax rates with a growing economy, which is patently false

excellent strawman

Because the the tax code before 1986 and after the 1986 reforms is comparing apples and bananas. They are completely different structurally. It wasn’t the case where they were adjusting marginal rates on a sliding scale and call it a day. It was an all encompassing reform. So to bring up the 90% marginal tax rate…

Isn’t that the whole philosophical outlook of the “Paradox of Tolerance”, you know which is repeated ad nasuem on this website

How many people were paying those rates at 90%

Because I can tell you right now, that tax code is a completely different animal than what we have today.

muh noble savage

Nothing wrong with the question - but expecting a detailed answer and a specific timeline to a problem 6 decades in the making only 2 days after initial meeting is asinine.

Except unlike Darwin’s Evolutionary theory Marx and Stalin’s theory cannot be falsified.

Which isn’t a problem for Dialectical Materialism or Historical Materialism on the onset, - as these are genuine scientific theories, however with each passing failure of it’s predicative model and with each Ad-Hoc rationalization…

Human nature is rooted in and directed through material conditions; change those conditions

But you’re right in the sense that most anarchists give themselves that label because they ostensibly want a stateless society now, instead of going through the evolution that Marx fantasized —- err —- I mean envisioned —- society would go through.

Because when it’s our turn, we won’t “make excuses for the terror.” Marx.

He’s being dishonest, he doesn’t want to reveal what he really is.

Take resources and put them in the hands of people who need them, alright? Seriously—the fuck is wrong with y’all?

Yeah I like where you were heading with this.

But at the same time, Franco did nothing wrong.