I’m not so sure. Here’s the rest of the listing:

It’s a big white round ottoman

It’s a living room.

I remember nothing of that book except being mildly confused throughout and ChickieNobs™.

You are making a lot of incorrect assumptions about, well.... Everything. For starters, hospitals actually lose money keeping patients on life support alive. They don’t benefit from it at all so you can stop with that horrid lie right now. For another, being in danger of imminent death gives doctors a lot of leeway to…

A new treatment that has not been tested yet for safety and efficacy is not something that is ethically owed to the patient, no matter how promising.

Oh yeah, it would have to be offered VERY carefully in order to not cause more harm to the patient, and you’re totally right that we’d have to trust the providers to offer the reversal in a reasonable and humane way, and those with anti-choice agendas have shown themselves to be anything trustworthy.

Yeah, once it’s out the in the world as a standard treatment to halt an abortion, it could be used for harm, but I don’t necessarily see the potential harm of it outweighing the potential benefit (and maybe that’s me being nearsighted?). Like the small minority of women whose medical abortions could be interceded by…

In the end as a supporter of a woman’s right to choose, I support her right to choose to reverse as well, as long as it’s provided ethically. I would hope abortion providers can see the value of this research and cooperate, even though it’s perverted by conservatives.

I think you could do it in a way that would pass an ethics board if you found women who changed their minds post-mifepristone and randomized them to get progesterone or not. The usual care arm would just be not taking the misoprostol.

Is it an abortion if it’s just the way you go about reproduction though? What the fuck would an abortion of an egg you laid even look like? An omelette?

Thank you. I’d like to think we can speculate about the likelihood of imagined abortions among (mostly) imagined characters without throwing all reason out the window!

I don’t know. I find it hard to imagine Tiffany would be willing to throw down with Rihanna.

It’s like when Rilakkuma was revealed to be, in fact, a bear in a bear suit. Take heed.

Have you seen The Mick? It’s basically Sweet Dee in California.

Unless you’re in a very competitive market, you’ll probably want to do the inspection after you’ve made the offer, right? Don’t spend the money unless you have to!

For balm, Aquafor really can’t be beat IMO.

That shit’s in a court document that is $0.10/page to request, but if you’re willing to pay, you can get cases like these at www.pacer.gov. I think law.com also did a detailed write-up, but again it’s behind a paywall. The headline certainly made it sound like it was dismissed due to lack of compelling evidence as…

All of that was presented before the judges, who sided with Yahoo. Nothing about the tone has changed. These guys got their asses handed to them.