ghjfhghjhhgcff
Peanut
ghjfhghjhhgcff

I’m republican and I think the courts should have no place in helping a business collect unpaid receivables from consumers.

If you want that kind of leverage, go business to business. If you sell a product or service to consumers, if your not paid, you can suck it up and write off the debt. That should be the law and

I’m going to keep my response gender and sexual orientation neutral out of respect for the readers here. It’s not always the male who doesn’t want kids. It’s not always a heterosexual couple that is discussing these things.

So lets dive in shall we?

Oh... who lives in a bubble in a big city?
Urban hipsters!
Self-Absorbent, judgemental and elitishly!
Urban hipsters!
Who nonsense they spew is something you wish
would go away and swim like a fish!
Urban hipsters!
Urban hipsters!
urban... hipsters! do do do do do..

If 3rd party order services do not benefit the businesses that enter into contract with them then they should avoid them and develop their own online ordering platform. I have my choice of about 5 different places to order pizza. All are close enough that I don’t have to have them deliver to me.

I’ve ordered from all

Their is only one way we could ever break that viscous cycle.

Extort the extoritionists.

If consumers could somehow become as organized akin to political parties, or unions and we collectively voted with our wallets whenever a corporation did something which we as an organized group found socially or morally

If I were this guy I’d be:

suing amazon
suing the maker of the bag who picked on the consumer rather then going after the 3rd party seller and amazon
writing my US senator and congressman and demanding that legislation be proposed and passed to protect consumers from this BS. I mean its not like Trump exactly likes Mr.

I really want tesla to succeed, but dammit, they can’t drop the ball like this. I hate to say it but tesla should really think about partnering with GM or Chrysler or one of the other big auto makers. Tesla has the vision, but they don’t have the industrial might and consistency of big auto.

I think my safety tip is to stay the heck away from anyplace where people are demonstrating or counter-demonstrating well, anything controversial be it on the right, the left or anything in between.

Seriously when it comes to personal safety, being a lazy git who doesn’t bother getting off your couch to come out and

I have been accused of mansplaining before. What my accusers don’t realize is my unfortunate tendency to be a know it all, interrupt people while they are talking and state the painfully obvious when it need not be stated is an equal opportunity character flaw that doesn’t discriminate based on gender, race, creed or

You sound like people who argue for unrestricted state surveillance of citzens.. If you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.

Wrong. The issue here is even if for every 10,000 cases, only 1 case of sexual assault involves someone who is falsely accused, and of that say 1 out of every 20

Yes. It is wrong to publically attack the credibility of a alleged victim of sexual assault. It is also insensitive and evil to call them horrible names.

However, it is equally wrong to ignore the bedrock principal of the American justice system which is no matter who is doing the accusing, no matter what it is the

The presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is a bedrock staple of the American justice system.

Paradoxically this runs counter to what we as a society have developed over the past 30 years where in order to encourage victims of sexual assault to come forward and report these heinous

Now playing

I actually think given the current social climate of the world we live in, one that has so much hate and anger and animosity, that we could use more people who are comfortable enough to hug someone else that they recognize needs it even if its someone they just met. Love heals. I mean don’t force hugs on people

So the judge failed to do his job impartially and with compassion and threw the book at her because he didnt know how to separate his personal negative views from the case. He should be disbarred for that. Positive mercy feelings, ok. Negative punitive feelings. Not ok. Do the former. Im fine with that. Do the

How she took the situation really should have no relevance or bearing on the case. In fact the judge was a complete asshole for letting his ego and personal
feelings get in the way. He should be disbarred. Any judge who can’t oversee cases with compassion, understanding, humanity , and love shouldn’t ever be allowed

What if this was your wife, mother, sister, or friend? Would you be posting compassionless bullshit like this on the internet then? What the fuck dude.

So the fuck what? People say dumb shit all the time, even in official briefings. You think this fucking judge could have just written that off as her blowing off some steam and stress especially since it has ZERO relevance to the facts of the case. Mercy? Compassion? Understanding? Why employ that when you can be a

So you believe in debtors prison? Fuck you.

So let me get this straight. She wasn’t going to get jail time for this offense until some guy who went to law school, probably served as a lawyer first, and then became a judge got his pants in a bunch over her being nice to him (mind you in an inappropriate setting and way, but still nice) in an official court

so are assholes with points to prove