ghaleonqq
GhaleonQ
ghaleonqq

Dang, if Merrick Garland isn't an SNES/SFC Final Fantasy name, I don't know what is.

And it's telling of Namco's brilliance that Ms. Pac Man is, like, the 400th best game they ever made, and it's really, really good. It's not a tragedy like Iwata or Takeshi Miyaji of Game Arts or Ryu Umemoto of Cave, but it's sad all the same! Good game, Nakamura.

Aaaaaaaahahahahahaha. Awesome. It's hilarious how often WWE elicits that same reaction from me when I'm hoping against hope or surprised by how, exactly, they disappointed me. "Aaaaaaaaaaaah, noooooOOOOOOOOO!"

See, the funny thing is that Rufus Shinra, whose good side was previously shown through the rescue of Elfe and Veld, recants and dedicates the rest of his life to saving the planet from his actions, and that the "real" villain is Sephiroth, who comes about through genetic manipulation and interaction outside of the

I am incredibly envious. We hung out after a Saint Vincent show, and she seemed like the coolest person. Even if you don't like her music, she's an awesome follow on social media, nerding out over the latest pedal or guitar, and she even fields technical questions from fans.

Not that we should begin making a comprehensive list of people we'd like to have seen kick Boll's ass, but I think Seanbaby's old girlfriend could also have destroyed him. http://www.seanbaby.com/nes…

As someone who loved Seanbaby since Electronic Gaming Monthly, I would have handed Boll 100 bucks to do it. It would have become the only thing Seanbaby talked about more than Golden Age comics and Phil Collins.

And now Deadspin guy is going to get murdered by some mixed-martial arts fighters. Not since Lowtax v. Boll!

Social mores are defined by whom, again? The president? I wish! The last one seemed like a pretty good dude, but everyone just ended up screaming at each other.

Good God, no. I'm past dreaming of longform pieces or creative premises (thanks to the main movie critics here for keeping that alive in 2017). Now, I'm longing for the days when Great Job, Internets were mildly interesting videos from 3 years ago. Show me more Konami speedruns and Korean Girls React To American Junk

Indeed. What Bearded said could be said of almost any political movement. Perhaps there's a greater thrill in odds being overcome, but they still picked winners and losers with it and often buried the losers.

I hear you, and, honestly, that is probably the actual reason. Even with its budget, pedigree, and message ("movies r kewl"), they wanted a genuine hit.

I am not going to spend the time searching social media to find out the answer, but this was delightful analysis. Even considering the above article, I want to watch "SLAYER Explains The Constitution." http://www.blabbermouth.net…

2017: The Year Of Strange, New Respect. Who knew filibusters, restraint on executive orders, organized protest, et cetera, et cetera were useful all along?

As the article above points out, your dislike of it (removed from its formal qualities) will hinge less on race, geographic location, urban/rural divide, or gender, than age.

I could MAYBE see it because 2 of the 3 involved the precious man teaching the neophyte about it, but, um, the 3rd one does, too, and I await the attribution of Simm-splaining for Whiplash soon.

This was the most enjoyable part to me of talking about the movie with other people. The meta- nature of musicals (or comedies, or mysteries, or anything that isn't a straightforward drama) is always something worth dissecting.

The more likely thing, as tons of thinkpieces have pointed out, is that progressivism has ossified as "the culture," so the only way to be "countercultural" is to be authentically reactionary or to troll progressivism.

Things get recommended as "hangout" shows a lot, but this is my version of a hangout show, as it should be for all of us dorks with weird voices and misaligned preferences in pop culture who just like really, really good jokes.