Plus, the oh-so-sexy moment at the midway point where one of you jostles the handle and either boiling hot or ice cold water comes cascading down.

I was just thinking the best way to have sex in the shower is make it old people friendly with hand rails and a grippy floor mat.

The rest are just in comas.

Somebody bought ad space on a billboard here in TN that just said “Cosmopolitan has Pornography” So people care. Also that’s the first time I saw the name Cosmopolitan in years. And the first time I saw porn be called pornography in like forever.

Do magazines like Cosmo give young girls body image issues because of unrealistic beauty standards? It’s certainly possible. Are these images the equivalent of sexual harassment/assault? Hell no.

One of the very few perks of being disqualified as lesser media, not worthy of attention by very serious people, is that “women’s” entertainment has an easier time getting stuff past the radar that wouldn’t fly anywhere else.

Do...do they know they can just not pick up the magazine? Boom! No longer exposed. I’m confident Cosmo isn’t giving detailed (and hilariously wrong) instructions for “risky”* anal sex on the cover.

Sounds kind of like “womyn”* in English speaking feminism.

Yeah, let’s shit on people for not knowing how to pronounce a completely illogically spelled word that just started gaining traction six months ago.

The judge was for sure getting a little snarky, but “modicum” and “banal” are in fact terms used when discussing whether a work of authorship is protectible.

Hi! Friendly neighborhood litigator here! This isn’t so much a burn on Taylor as it is an accurate statement of copyright law. You can’t copyright short, commonly-used phrases, because that’s not really what the law is intended to protect, and the law shouldn’t be used to create monopolies on super-common phrases…

Just talking isn’t rapping.

Judges gonna judge.

Just because he seems well intentioned does not mean he couldn’t be accidentally coercive nor does it mean he does not need to follow normal legal procedures.

I mean I think we’re probably going to disagree here, and that’s okay.

The appropriate thing to do would be to go through whichever government agency that area has for child protective services and place the child in temporary custody (potentially a relative) while the mother enters treatment and potentially one day has some type of contact or even custody of her child.

I absolutely disagree with you but for the sake of argument, did the cop try to contact the woman’s relatives? Why is HIS family necessarily the best option? Considering there are many families looking for babies to adopt, why did his family get to adopt this one? The story has many many holes. There is a lot that we…

Not fighting with you, but with all due respect, I can think in at least one scenario where that “mother” should totally have ever kept that kid: she gets the help she needs - and its an obligation of the State to provide! -, hopefuly recovers, and go on becoming a good mother. You call it “insanity”, I call it…

Not to defend him, but he said “his or her mother’s womb.” It’s clumsy, but it’s not wrong.

““I know how inner-city Memphis is,” added James Del Brock, co-founder of the Hiwaymen. “I’ve drove through a lot of it. I’ve drove through it with my motorcycle and battle flag. I’ve always wanted to know, because I’m a white person, how to reach into the inner city without getting shot.”