Why do you think noting a film’s deficiencies means you’re aren’t treating it as serious cinema?
Why do you think noting a film’s deficiencies means you’re aren’t treating it as serious cinema?
They don’t and I didn’t say they did. Do you read anything before you type?
Um did you guys miss all the fawning over Infinity War, Black Panther, Endgame, Winter Soldier?
See their comments on myriad marvel movies
My point, that many people are ludicrous pedants when it comes to the phrase “free medical care”, is entirely valid and you can’t stand that you didn’t realise it until you’d committed to your meltdown, it’s why you’re giving up.
The people desperate to have Marvel movies considered as serious cinema aren’t all fanboys (though you’re right they do as well of course) many critics and progressives do as well.
It’s not fanboys but critics and progressives suggesting Marvel movies are serious cinema.
That’s 7 letters and it’s still not a big word except for remedial people like yourself.
Actual lol you think 6 letters makes a big word and that you’ve again demonstrated an inability to understand context.
I think Dan’s assumption about those men, or what those men tell him isn’t the reality. The assumption is those men aren’t equally as vulnerable and haven’t been coerced but we all know people can be fooled into thinking what they want/need is OK even if it’s doing damage.
But she knows that won’t happen. And she’s not doing the bus ride but she’s still doing everything else.
Ah yes the pseudo-intellectual’s version of “I know you are but what am I”. You’re flailing.
Just say you don’t know what the word pedant means or don’t understand the context, it’ll be quicker.
You’ve not given anything to deflect, you started with an arsey comment and continued them when I wouldn’t play your debate me game. Only thing you’ve thrown is a tantrum.
Yes yes I’m sure you’re going to look at evidence that proves you wrong with an objective eye, you’ve been so reasonable before. You might as well just scream “debate me”.
I dont see anywhere that she says shes not turned on by it anymore, she says she still likes having the guy who treat her like shit in her life and she really fancies him.
Reread her letter, you can apologise after.
I didn’t suggest she wanted it, the opposite really. But Dan has a history of giving advice that is based on the idea of stuff that turns you on is good, it’s like with the children who wanted bondage stuff the other week.
You’re the one incapable of understanding things outside of your frame of reference so much so you attack them.
There’s no distorted frame, there’s plenty of experience you don’t have.