True, and no revives is a huge benefit for him too, since he can never revive this puts him on a more even playing field.

If it’s any consolation, I don’t think anybody has been good/lucky enough to go flawless on a 1v3. I’ve seen people get to maybe 5-6 wins with the boons, but a full team of not terrible players is still usually enough to beat one god.

He is so a cat. #TBJ

Did he say he would vote for Trump? I missed that. If anything, it sounds like he’s the type of person who would decide not to vote for Trump because he has a potty mouth, which IMO is a silly reason not to vote for Trump. The better reason not to vote for Trump is because he’s an incompetent moron who brags about…

Personally, the word “fuck” doesn’t really bother me. I don’t have a problem with the NYT printing it. But I recognize that a lot of people are upset by the word, and I do think that’s only a little old fashioned. I don’t think saying, “I would prefer to see ‘f***’ to ‘fuck’ is entirely unreasonable.” It is pretty…

That’s fair, and I’m not calling for this article to be deleted or anything. But I think the post wasn’t done as well as it could have been, and it distracted me into a kind of semantic argument about whether swears should be censored or not/which swears Werder was referencing. But I guess the inaccuracy got me to…

Touché.

But why not be accurate in this article? If your stance is, Using “F***” instead of “fuck” and “pu***,” instead of “pussy” dilute the horror of what Trump said, the words are more powerful if printed in full, why obscure what Werder is saying? I truly think Werder’s only point is, “I wish the NYT had printed “f***”…

Yeah, I’d missed the update. But even that is kinda weak. It is explicit that he’s upset about “fuck.” That’s what he’s responding to, and he references “four letter words,” in his subsequent tweets. And the disagreement about whether he should be quoted saying “fuck” or “f***” just seems so minor to me that it’s…

See, I don’t agree that that is what Werder is saying. His response to a tweeted cover of the NYT with the caption, “Yup, that’s the f word on the cover of the NYT” was “Don’t see how that’s necessary. He can be quoted and we can all know what he’s saying without seeing all four letters.” I can see the argument that…

See, I normally enjoy their snarky takedowns of morons. Like the video from earlier of Ana Navarro yelling at Scottie Nell Hughes. It just seems in this case that Ed Werner is being more of an old prude than a genuine moron. And not even in a particularly amusing or flamboyant fashion. He’s just saying he doesn’t…

Reading his timeline, it seems like he was actually objecting to the word “fuck.” Specifically, it being on the cover of the New York Times, and that he would have preferred “f***.” It’s a little old fashioned, but I don’t think it’s as colossally stupid as you make it out to be.