The issue clearly isn't in the efficiency of production - its a distribution issue: the people who have money enough to buy food buy it in excess, and the people who temperately need it have no money to buy it.
The issue clearly isn't in the efficiency of production - its a distribution issue: the people who have money enough to buy food buy it in excess, and the people who temperately need it have no money to buy it.
The poor don't get that food cause they don't have the money to pay for it in the first place, far less to get is shipped to them. If food literally came from nowhere, the price would collapse and if you could make it anywhere, transport wouldn't be an issue either.
I was a lot more enthusiastic about this episode than Alex, by far. To call the developments "predictable" is very harsh - yes, the show set them all up, but that is not the same as things being predictable, specially how they did Robbie's origin, cause no, Johnny Blaze showing up was NOT PREDICTABLE. And Eli's heel…
Ah, that was Johnny Blaze….
Until today I did not know this mess of a theory even existed - and now to see people defending it like this?
We have seen multiple scenes of the corporate woman (whose name I don't remember) stating that Ford is doing things that the board doesn't like - its clear that Ford's corporate backers think he isn't doing a good job - the park hemorrhaging money would explain that.
"We all know her reason to stay away is bullshit"
Seeing the prisoners running back into the cells when Ghost Rider comes out of the cell was a great little visual. Also, the Daisy fight had some great bits in it - throwing that one guy into a fridge? Fun.
Briege is one of the folk that thinks the writers 'did Grant wrong' and that because the writers showed him having an abusive childhood (possibly) they were morally obligated to make him a good guy at the end - hence the "victim blaming" stuff.
I disagree with the claim that the James story was weak - James knows about the Watchdogs from last year, and him choosing a more destructive and fundamentally selfish answer to self- loathing is also in character. The technical aspect of them hacking his watch were fine as well.
Daisy being hurt by her own power is a show invention (not true for the character in the comics)
The Marvel universe's take on government authorities is absurd, but even within that insanity, Christian is still an official of the US government, and Ward was being collected by the rightful authorities, and what his brother wanted to do was put him on trial…what a terrible thing!
His brother was the Authorities.
Ward is a fiction. "He" doesn't exist outside of the story. And in the story, he was fundamentally a selfish, self absorbed individual - a "thirsty soul". The writers showed us his fundamental flaws by setting up "redemption arcs" and then having the character ignore them for his selfish needs. They show us his true…
Nope. There is plenty of "Skye" left, including being a smart ass and the self-loathing sometimes - something that Chloe agrees with by the way. lets not be selective with how you quote the actors.
SHIELD didn't make him into a monster - that is absurd.
Fitz has had a lot of negative things happen to him over the last few years - I would not be surprised that he has been taking lessons to be able to better defend himself. Also, Fitz hardly fights in a highly trained manner - what counts in such encounters in the willingness to engage as much as anything.
Right, because "Skye" was an invention of Daisy's, one she no longer needs.
It also happens to be a reality - many abused become abusers themselves.
So its vile to hand a murderer and terrorist to the authorities?