If by the worst you mean correct in this argument, then yes.

Worst kind of person? Nah, that is a title reserved for fans of Atlas Shrugged.

Correct, nothing at all that happens on the actual show supports the claim that Andrew is Lash, as I have been saying all through this thread.

The only fail I see is you failing to answer my obvious question about the validity of your speculations given what we actually see in the show. Like LoveWaffle, you are clearly impotent when it comes to dealing with direct show evidence that showcases how weak your speculations are.

Like I said, battles of wit against nitwits are always so easy.

Oh look, beyond being late to the party you are a complete intellectual coward, like all Randians.

if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen, child.

I only troll Rand fans who think they are saying things that are smart (as if anyone with half a brain would like to claim a connection to Ayn). I especially like trolling people who write long posts that at the end signify nothing at all.

You get a job writing for this show? Cause you speak with much certainty about things that don't exist even as concepts.

Oh, the wanna be Galtian ubermensch thinks he has a point - how cute.

Dollar short and dollar late, Randbot.

Well, again, mutants specifically were just a way to shortcut the need for specific origin stories and allow for the creation of masses of superpowered beings. Why should Marvel give up the potential stories that populating the world with superheroes create while it waits for Fox to surrender the rights? Its…

The XMen are more popular because they were an easier story to tell. hardly a ringing endorsement.

And this changes nothing about what I said, that going the "mutation" route was simply a way to get beyond having to do an origin story for every superpowered person (evoking evolution in this process is deeply scientifically ignorant, so I will ignore that), and since the MCU is just getting to the point in which…

Your argument was that Lash was not in control of his actions. Him making a mistake is a completely different thing - I mean, how many mistakes have the members of the SHIELD team made? I have no problem with claiming he was mistaken, but making claiming that a mistake is proof that an action was not controlled is…

Yeah, stealth mechanics on video games, cause that is clearly an appropriate analog for the shadow issue……yup…

I know the reference very well - the problem is that Garner says absolutely nothing to make us reasonably think (as opposed to jumping into wild speculation free of evidence, as you have) that he was warning Alex about Alex's own physical safety from anything Garner might do to him.

The Hulk IS HIS POWERS! He is a giant, super strong monster, period. Him controlling his powers is about as difficult as you or anyone else knowing how to walk, or run, all things an adult like Bruce Banner knows how to do. The only reason Hulk exists, as you yourself state, it because of Banner's anger problems - but…

"No, because it has a negative connotation. Welcome back to square one."

I have worked as an investigator - unless Ward has a trained sketch artists on payroll, just describing a guy is not a viable way of describing someone to another human being with enough exactitude to think others might recognize them.