I'm sorry I didn't list all 31 review scores. I figured we were all intelligent enough to understand what each color meant in my summary.

"Resident Evil 6 is currently being mauled by the critics."

At least they owned up to it.

Probably already been said, but the Doctor didn't kill all the Daleks and Time Lords in the Time War. He just sealed them within a bubble of time, trapped for eternity. They're all still alive.

It's gotten even better over the last few years, too when they fired the old staff and got fans to replace them.

Out of all of that schlock I just watched, the only thing I found remotely amusing was Lando's line at the end of the third clip. Everything else was just awful and unfunny.

Why the hell do people think a 70% rating is BAD?

Destructoid's Jim Sterling hated on the game too. And surprise, surprise, he didn't know about the ability to turn off Auto-Battle either. Someone in the comments mentioned it, so he tried to cover his ass and put it in the review, but said it didn't matter (despite the majority of his complaint stemming from…

But... this game's art is done by O'Malley... so it makes sense to say its like Scott Pilgrim. And where else do you see people relating things to Scott Pilgrim? This is the first time I've seen it.

But where does L4D fit in all of this?

Because they probably cut corners like most people do and had the program do the lip syncing for them without touching it up.

Enjoy your era of "Not Owning Anything." The biggest concern I have about cloud services is that at a whim, the owners of said cloud can take away your content forever. For instance, when Gamefly bought Direct2Drive, people lost access to all of the games they bought from D2D and had to RE-BUY them at a "discounted…

Holy crap its 2012, does this really still have to be an issue??

Those must be some unbelievably obscure internet memes, then, because I seriously don't see ANY references. I'm not going to sit here and try to verify my nerd cred or something, I'm just saying that I've been around long enough to know them.

Well thank you for creating a pointless conversation.

Projecting? Do you even know what that word means? Did you miss it when the header image had two characters that have surprise reveals in the film?

So you read the article and totally missed the two parts where they talk about stories that focused on Ra's and Talia, and still thought my comment was more spoileriffic? I said the two show up in this movie, the fact that the article talks about comics with these characters should be a MASSIVE give-away that they are…

No, it doesn't. I scrolled through and saw the original header and thought "Oh hey, there's Ra's, so that must be Talia, and the header is talking about spoilers for Dark Knight Rises. HMM." I'm obviously not going to be the only one to come to that conclusion without even reading the article. Pointing out that a…

Your logic makes no sense when I'm commenting within an article all about spoilers.

So you're saying I shouldn't talk about spoilers in the comments section of an article that is all about discussing the spoilers of the film and includes a disclaimer in the first paragraph? Come on, man.